Visualizing tissue compliance with MR imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 733-738

  Plewes, D B ^a   Betty, I ^b   Urchuk, S N ^a   Soutar, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Compliance; Motion studies; Phase Imaging; Tissue properties

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPLIANCE (PHYSICAL); ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; ELASTICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; NEOPLASM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

COMPLIANCE; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; ELASTICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0029401466     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880050620     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review
2. Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: im‐plications for vascular collapse
3. Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues
4. The significance of the “tissue pressure” of normal testicular and of neoplastic (Brown‐Pearce carcinoma) tissue in the rabbit
5. “Sonoelasticity” images de‐rived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues
6. Elastog‐raphy: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of bio‐logical tissues
7. A flow zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans
8. Encoding strategies for three‐direction phase‐contrast MR imaging of flow
9. Factors influencing the accuracy and precision of velocity‐encoded phase imaging
10. Cerebro‐spinal flu id shuts: flow measurements with MR imaging
11. Velocity correlation method for measurement of vascular compliance using MR imaging
12. Measurement of pulsatile pressure gradients
13. Stahl‐berg F. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrody‐namics studied by magnetic phase imaging: the Monro‐Kellie doctrine revisited
14. Agarose as a tissue equivalent phantom material for NMR imaging
15. Sensitivity of magnetic‐resonance current‐density imaging