Comparison of reliability performance of group connected and conventional hvdc transmission systems

IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 1889-1895

  Kuruganty, Sastry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

(HVDC)Transmission; generation; High Voltage Direct Current; hydro electric; Reliability; unit connection

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; HYDROELECTRIC GENERATORS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERFORMANCE; RELIABILITY;

CONVENTIONAL COMMON COLLECTOR SYSTEM; GROUP CONNECTED SCHEME; UNIT CONNECTION;

HVDC POWER TRANSMISSION;

EID: 0029390199     PISSN: 08858977     EISSN: 19374208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/61.473366     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. M. Naidu and R. M. Mathur, “Evaluation of Unit Connected Variable Speed Hydro Power Stations for HVDC Power Transmission", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 4., No. 2. May 1989, pp. 668-676.
2. D. A. Woodford, L. Ingram, L. Zehong, “Reliability of Unit Connected HVDC Transmission and Hydro Generation", CIGRE International Colloquium on HVDC Power Transmission, 13 August 1989, Racife, Brazil.
3. S. Kuruganty, D. A. Woodford, “A Reliability Cost-Benefit Analysis for HVDC Transmission Expansion Planning", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 3. No. 3. July 1988, pp. 1241-1248.
4. S. Kuruganty, “Effect of HVDC Transmission Component Enhancement on the Overall System Reliability Performance", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 6, No 1, January 1994, pp. 343-349.
5. L. D. Recksiedler, “Manitoba Hydros HVDC Transmission System Computerized Data Base Storage and Retrieval System”. 15th INTER-RAM Conference for the Power Industry Conference Record. 1988, pp. 357-363.
6. Canadian Electrical Association, “Forced Outage Performance of Transmission Equipment for the Period, January 1, 1982 to December 31, 1986", March 1988.