Design and Development of High-Performance Torque-Controlled Joints

IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 537-544

  Vischer, Dieter ^a   Khatib, Oussama ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; CONTROL NONLINEARITIES; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FORCE CONTROL; FRICTION; INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; MANIPULATORS; MOTION CONTROL; SENSORS; STRAIN GAGES; TORQUE CONTROL; TRANSDUCERS;

DYNAMIC DECOUPLING; GEAR SYSTEMS; JOINT TORQUE CONTROLLER DESIGN; SENSOR DESIGN;

UNIVERSAL JOINTS;

EID: 0029356378     PISSN: 1042296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/70.406938     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. B. Armstrong, “Dynamics for robot control: Friction modeling and ensuring excitation during parameter identification,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, June 1988.
2. H. Asada and T. Kanade, “Design of direct-drive mechanical arms,” ASME J. Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 312-316, 1983.
3. H. Asada, K. Youcef-Toumi, and S. K. Lim, “Joint torque measurement of a direct drive arm,” in Proc. 23d IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 1984, pp. 1332-1337.
4. E. Colgate and N. Hogan, “An analysis of contact instability in terms of passive physical environments,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., Scottsdale, AZ, 1989, pp. 404-409.
5. S. D. Eppinger and W. P. Seering, “On dynamics of robot force control,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., San Francisco, CA, 1986, pp. 29-34.
6. “Understanding bandwidth limitations in robot force control,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., 1987, pp. 904-909.
7. G. Hirzinger et al., “The sensory and telerobotic aspects of the space robot technology experiment Rotex,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Artificial Intell., Robotics and Automation in Space, Toulouse, France, 1992, pp. 83-110.
8. R. Holmberg, S. Dickert, and O. Khatib, “A new actuation system for high-performance torque-controlled manipulators,” in Proc. RoManSy 9, CISM-IFToMM Symp. Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Udine, Italy, 1992, pp. 285-292.
9. O. Khatib, B. Roth, and K. Waldron, “The design of a high-performance force-controlled manipulator,” in Proc. 8th IFToMM World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, Prague, Czechoslovakia, 1991, pp. 475-478.
10. J. Y. S. Luh, W. D. Fisher, and R. P. Paul, “Joint torque control by a direct feedback for industrial robots,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. AC-28, no. 2, pp. 153-160, 1983.
11. L. Pfeffer, O. Khatib, and J. Hake, “Joint torque sensory feedback in the control of a PUMA manipulator,” IEEE Trans. Robotics Automat., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 418-425, 1989.
12. R. K. Roberts, R. P. Paul, and B. M. Hillberry, “The effect of wrist sensor stiffness on the control of robot manipulators,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., St. Louis, MO, 1985, pp. 269-274.
13. G. Stepan and L. Stevan, “Theoretical and experimental stability analysis of a hybrid position-force controlled robot,” in Proc. RoManSy 8, CISM-IFToMM Symp. Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Cracow, Poland, July 1990.
14. D. Vischer and O. Khatib, “Design and development of torque-controlled joints,” in Experimental Robotics I, V. Hayward and Khatib, Eds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 271-286.
15. D. E. Whitney. “Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automat., St. Louis, MO, 1985, pp. 883-889.
16. C. H Wu and R. P. Paul, “Manipulator compliance based on joint torque control,” in Proc. 19th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 1980, pp. 88-94.