Why Looking Isn't Always Seeing: Readership Skills and Graphical Programming

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 33-44

  Petre, Marian ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALOG MAPPING; GRAPHICAL PROGRAMMING; GRAPHICAL READERSHIP; GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION; SECONDARY NOTATION; TEXTUAL REPRESENTATION; TEXTUAL VISUAL DISTINCTION; VISUAL PROGRAMMING; VISUAL REPRESENTATION;

CODES (SYMBOLS); COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FORMAL LOGIC; GRAPHIC METHODS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PERFORMANCE; PETRI NETS; SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 0029327901     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: 15577317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/203241.203251     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anzai, Y. Learning diagram-drawing and graphical reading skills: analysis and design. Presented to: Workshop on Graphical Representations, Reasoning, and Communication, AI-ED '93 (Edin-burgh, August, 1993).
2. Bouwhuis, D. G. Reading as goal-driven behaviour. In B. A. G. Elsendoorn and H. Bouma, Eds., Working Models of Human Perception. Academic Press, 1988, pp. 341–362.
3. Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M.J., Eds. The Nature of Expertise. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
4. Cleveland, W.S., and McGill, R. Graphical perception: theory, experimentation and application to the development of graphical methods. Amer. Statistical Assoc. 79, (1984), 531–554.
5. Davies, S. P. Skill levels and strategic differences in plan comprehension and implementation in programming. In A. Sutcliffe and L. Macaulay, Eds., People and Computers V. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989.
6. Gibson, E.J., and Levin, H. The Psychology of Reading. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1975.
7. Gilmore, D. J., and Green, T. R. G. Programming plans and programming expertise. Quarterly J. of Experimental Psych. 40A (1988), 423–442.
8. Green, T.R.G., and Petre, M. When visual programs are harder to read than textual programs. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE-6), Budapest, Hungary, September 1992.
9. Green, T. R. G., Petre, M., and Bellamy, R. K. E. Comprehensibility of visual and textual programs: A test of Superlativism against the “match-mismatch” conjecture. In Empirical Studies of Programmers Fourth Workshop. Ablex, 1991.
10. Horowitz, P., and Hill, W. The Art of Electronics. 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989.
11. Koga, K., and Groner, R. Intercultural experiments as a research tool in the study of cognitive skill acquisition: Japanese character recognition and eye movements in non-Japanese subjects. In H. Mandl and J.R. Levin Eds., Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures. North-Holland, 1989, 279–291.
12. Kosslyn, S.M. Imagery and internal representation. In E. Rosch and B.B. Lloyd, Eds., Cognition and Categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1978, 227–286.
13. Mackinlay, J. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM TOGS 5, 2 (1986), 110–141.
14. Moher, T.G., Mak, D.C., Blumenthal, B., and Leventhal, L.M. Comparing the comprehensibility of textual and graphical programs: The case of Petrinets. In C.R. Cook, J.C. Scholtz, and J.C. Spohrer, Eds., Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fifth Workshop. Ablex, 1993, 137–161.
15. Mwers, B.A. Taxonomies of visual programming and program visualization. JVLC 1, 1 (1990), 97123.
16. Pennington, N. Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs. Cognitive Psychology 19, (1987), 295–341.
17. Petre, M., and Green, T. R. G. Where to draw the line with text: Some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. In INTERACT’90 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 1990.
18. Petre, M., and Green, T. R. G. Requirements of graphical notations for professional users: Electronics CAD systems as a case study. Le Travail Humain 55, 1 (1992), 47–70.
19. Petre, M., and Green, T.R.G. Learning to read graphics: some evidence that 'seeing’ an information display is an acquired skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 4 (1993), 55–70.
20. Raymond, D. Characterizing visual languages. In The 1991 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages, (1991) IEEE Computer Society Press.
21. Rohr, G. Using visual concepts. In S-K. Chang, T. Ichikawa and P.A. Ligomenides, Eds., Visual Languages. Plenum Press, 1986.
22. Shu, N.C. Visual Programming. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.
23. Sime, M.E., Green, T.R.G., and Guest, D.J. Scope marking in computer conditionals—A psychological evaluation. IJMMS 9, (1977) 107–118.
24. Swigger, K.M., and Brazile, R.P. An empirical study of the effects of design/documentation formats on expert system modifiability. In J. Joenemann-Belliveau, T. Moher, and S. Robertson, Eds., Empirical Studies of Programmers: Fourth Workshop, Ablex, 1991.
25. Treisman, A. Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American (1986), 106–115.