Analysis of the Performance and Sensitivity of Eigendecomposition-Based Detectors

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 1413-1426

  Xu, Wenyuan ^a   Kaveh, Mostafa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILITY; RANDOM PROCESSES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; STATISTICS;

COVARIANCE MATRIX; DETECTOR COST FUNCTIONS; EIGENDECOMPOSITION BASED DETECTORS; ESTIMATED EIGENVALUES; RANDOM VECTOR;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 0029325339     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: 19410476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/78.388854     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. M. Wax and T. Kailath, “Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria,” IEEE Trans. Acoust, Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-33, pp. 387-392, Apr. 1985.
2. H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-19, pp. 716-723, 1974.
3. G. Schwartz, “Estimating the dimension of a model,” Ann. Statist., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 461-464, 1978.
4. J. Rissanen, “Modeling by shortest data description,” Automatic, vol. 14, 465-471, 1978.
5. J. Pierre and M. Kaveh, “Experimental performance of calibration and direction-finding algorithms,” in Proc. ICASSP-91, Toronto, Canada, May 1991. pp. 1365-1368.
6. D. L. Donoho and P. J. Huber, “The notion of breakdown point,” in A Festschrift for Erich Lehmann, P. Bickel, K. Doksum, and J. L. Hodges, Jr., eds. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980.
7. A. T. James, “Distributions of matrix variates and latent roots derived from normal samples,” Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 35, pp. 475-501, 1964.
8. T. W. Anderson, “Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis,” Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 34, pp. 122-148, 1963.
9. H. Wang and M. Kaveh, “On the performance of signal subspace processing—Part I: Narrow-band systems,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-34, pp. 1201-1209, 1986.
10. M. Kaveh, H. Wang, and H. Hung, “On the theoretical performance of a class of estimators of the number of narrow-band sources,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-35,pp. 1350-1352, 1987.
11. Q. Zhang, K. M. Wong, P. C. Yip, and J. P. Reilly, “Statistical analysis of the performance of information theoretic criteria in the detection of the number of signals in array processing,” IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, vol. 37, pp. 1557-1567, 1989.
12. C. S. Herz, “Bassel functions of matrix argument,” Ann. Math., vol. 61, pp. 474-523, 1965.
13. A. Takemura, Zonal Polynomials. Hayward, CA: Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1984.
14. D. R. Brillinger, Time Series Data Analysis and Theory, expanded ed. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day, Inc., 1981.
15. H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I. New York: Wiley, 1968.
16. C. G. Khatri, “Distribution of the largest or smallest characteristic root under null hypotheses concerning complex multivariate normal populations,” Ann. Math. Statist., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1807-1810, 1964.
17. L. C. Zhao, P. R. Krishnaiah, and Z. D. Bai, “On detection of signals in presence of white noise,” J. Multivariate Anal., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1-25, 1986.
18. W. Xu, J. Pierre, and M. Kaveh, “Practical detection with calibrated arrays,” in Proc. 6th SSAP Workshop Statist. Signal Array Processing, Victoria, Canada, 1992, 82-85.
19. H. Cramer, Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Pr., 1946.
20. R. P. Gupta, “Asymptotic theory for principal component analysis in the complex case,” J. India Statist. Assoc., vol. 3, pp. 97-106, 1965.