Flow structures at the proximal slde-to-end anastomosis. Influence of geometry and flow division

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 224-236

  Hughes, P E ^a   How, T V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; FLOW PATTERNS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; GEOMETRY; LAMINAR FLOW; LIGHTING; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); POLYURETHANES; PULSATILE FLOW; REYNOLDS NUMBER; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VORTEX FLOW;

ANASTOMOSIS; FLOW DIVISION; LAMINAR REGIME; STEADY FLOW;

HEMODYNAMICS;

POLYURETHAN;

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTERY; ARTERY INTIMA PROLIFERATION; ARTICLE; FLOW; GEOMETRY; MODEL; PULSATILE FLOW; VELOCITY;

ARTERIES; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMAN; HYPERPLASIA; IN VITRO; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0029294437     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2796005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Asakura, T., and Karino, T., 1990, “Flow Patterns and Spatial Distribution of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Human Coronary Arteries,” Circ. Res., Vol. 66, pp. 1045-1066.
2. Bassiouny, H. S., White, S., Glagov, S., Choi, E., Giddens, D. P., and Zarins, C K, 1992, “Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia; Mechanical Injury or Flow Induced,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 15, pp. 708-717.
3. Berguer, R., Higgins, R. F., and Reddy, D. J., 1980, “Intimal Hyperplasia,” Arch. Surg., Vol. 115, pp. 332-335.
4. Burkcl, W. E., 1988, “The Challenge of Small Diameter Vascular Grafts,” Med. Progr. Tech., Vol. 14, pp. 165-175.
5. Clowes, A. W., and Reidy, M. A., 1991, “Prevention of Stenosis After Vascular Reconstruction: Pharmacological Control of intimal Hyperplasia—A Review,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 13, pp. 885-891.
6. Crawshaw, H. M., Quist, W. C., Scrrallach, E., Valeri, C. R., and LoGcrfo, F. W., 1980, “Flow Disturbance at the Distal End-to-Sidc Anastomosis,” Arch. Surg., Vol. 115, pp. 1280-1284.
7. DeWessc, J. A., and Green, R. M., 1980, “Anastomotic Ncointimal Fibrous Hyperplasia,” Complications in Vascular Surgery, Bernhard, V. M. and Towne, J. B., eds., Chapter 9, Grune and Stratton, New York.
8. Esquivel, C. O., and Blaisdcll, F. W., 1986, “Why Small Caliber Vascu-lar Grafts Fail: A Review of Clinical and Experimental Experience and the Significance of the Interaction of Blood at the Interface,” J. Surg. Res., Vol. 41, pp. 1-15.
9. Fearn, R. M., Mullin, T., and Cliffe, K. A., 1990, “Nonlinear Flow Phenomena in a Symmetric Sudden Expansion,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 211, pp. 595-608.
10. Hughes, P. E., and How, T. V., 1993, “Pulsatile Velocity Distribution and Wall Shear Rate Measurement Using Pulsed Doppler Ultrasound,” J. Biomech., Vol. 27, pp. 103-110.
11. Karino, T., and Goldsmith, H. L 1985, “Particle Flow Behavior in Models of Branching Vessels II. Effects of Branching Angle and Diameter Ratio on Flow Patterns,” Biorheology, Vol. 22, pp. 87-104.
12. Kinley, C. E., and Marble, A. E., 1980, “Compliance: A Continuing Problem With Vascular Grafts,”7. Cardiouasc. Surg., Vol. 21, pp. 163-170.
13. Keynton, R. S., Rittgers, S. E., and Shu, M. C. S., 1991, “The Effect of Angle and Flow Rate Upon Hemodynamics in Distal Vascular Graft Anastomoses: An In Vitro Model Study,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 113, pp. 458-463.
14. LoGerfo, F. W., Soncrant, T., Teel, T., and Dewey, C. F., 1979, “Boundary Layer Separation in Models of Side-to-End Arterial Anastomoses,” Arch. Surg., Vol. 114, pp. 1369-1373.
15. LoGerfo, F. W., 1991, “The Blood-Materials Interaction and Downstream Effects in Prosthetic Conduits,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 13, pp. 741-742.
16. Mitsumata, M., Fishel, R. S., Nerem, R. M., Alexander, R. W., Berk, B. C., 1993, “Fluid Shear Stress Stimulates Platelet Derived Growth Factor Expression in Endothelial Cells,” Am. J. Physiol., Vol. 256, pp. H3-H8.
17. Morinaga, K., Okadome, K., Kuroki, M., Miyazaki, T., Muto, Y., and Inokuchi, K., 1985, “Effect of Wall Shear Stress on Intimal Thickening of Arterially Transplanted Autogenous Veins in Dogs,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 2, pp. 430-433.
18. Nerem, R. M., and Levesque, M. J, 1987, “Fluid Mechanics in Atherosclerosis,” Handbook of Bioengineering, Skalak, R. and Chien, S., eds. Chapter 21, McGraw-Hill, New York.
19. Nowak, M. D., LoGerfo, F. W and Quist, W. C., 1982, “Models of Side-to-End Anastomoses: Effects of Angle and Flow Split,” J. Surg. Res., Vol. 32, pp. 489-498.
20. Ojha, M., Ethier, C. R., Johnston, K. W and Cobbold, R. S. C., 1990, “Steady and Pulsatile Flow Fields in an End-to-Side Arterial Anastomosis Model,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 12, pp. 747-753.
21. Ojha, M., Cobbold, R. S. C., and Johnston, K. W., 1993, “Hemodynamics of a Side-to-End Proximal Arterial Anastomosis Model,” J. Vase. Surg., Vol. 17, pp. 646-655.
22. Rittgers, S. E., Karayannacos, P. E., Guy, J. F., Nerem, R. M., Shaw, G. M., Hostetler, J. R., and Vaško, J. S., 1978, “Velocity Distribution and Intimal Proliferation in Autologous Vein Grafts in Dogs,” Circ. Res., Vol. 42, pp. 792-801.
23. Roach, M. R., Scott, S., and Ferguson, G. G., 1972, “The Hemodynamics of the Circle of Willis (Glass Model Studies),” Stroke, Vol. 3, pp. 255-267.
24. Ross, R., and Glomset, J. A., 1976, “The Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis,” N. Engl. J. Med., Vol. 259, pp. 420-425.
25. Sarpkaya, T., 1992, “Brief Reviews of Some Time-Dependent Flows,” ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 114, pp. 283-298.
26. Sottiurai, V. S., Yao, J. S. T., Batson, R. C., Lim Sue, S., Jones, R., and Nakamura, Y. A., 1989, “Distal Anastomotic Intimal Hyperplasia: Histopathologic Character and Biogenesis,” Ann. Vase. Surg., Vol. 3, pp. 26-33.
27. Steinman, D. A., Vinh, B., Ethier, C. R., Ojha, M., Cobbold, R. S. C., and Johnston, K. W., 1993, “A Numerical Simulation of Flow in a Two-Dimensional End-to-Side Anastomosis Model,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 115, pp. 112-118.
28. White, S. S., Zarins, C. K., Giddens, D. P., Bassiouny, H., Loth, F., Jones, S. A., and Glagov, S., 1993, “Hemodynamic Patterns in Two Models of End-to-Side Vascular Graft Anastomoses: Effects of Pulsatil-ity, Flow Division, Reynolds Number, and Hood Length,” ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 115, p. 104-111.