A multiscale approach to sensor fusion and the solution of linear inverse problems

Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 127-147

  Miller, Eric ^a   Willsky, Alan S ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA HANDLING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; RANDOM PROCESSES; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

MAXIMUM A POSTERIORI INVERSION ALGORITHM; MULTISCALE STOCHASTIC MODELS; RELATIVE COVARIANCE MATRIX;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 0029290067     PISSN: 10635203     EISSN: 1096603X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/acha.1995.1009     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. B. Alpert, G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, and V. Rokhlin, Wavelets forthe fast solution of second-kind integral equations, SIAM J. Scient.Comput, 14, No. 1 (1993), 159-184.
2. A. Baggeroer and W. Monk, The Heard Island feasibility test, Phys. Today (Sept. 1992), 22-30.
3. M. Bertero, C. De Mol, and E. R. Pike, Linear inverse problems with discrete data. II. Stability and régularisation. Inverse Problems4 (1988), 573-594.
4. G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, and V. Rokhlin, Fast wavelet transforms andnumerical algorithms, I, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 44(1991), 141-183.
5. D. C. Brown and B. H. Barber, Progress in electrical impedance tomography, in “Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations”(D. Colton, R. Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds.), Chap. 10, pp. 151-164, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.
6. A. M. Brukstein, B. C. Levy, and T. Kailath, Differential methods in inverse scattering, SIAM J. Appl. Math 45, No. 2 (Apr. 1985), 312-389.
7. K. P. Bube and R. Burridge, The one dimensional inverse problem ofreflection seismology, SIAM Rev. 25, No. 4 (Oct. 1983), 497-5559.
8. J. Carrera and S. P. Neuman, Estimation of aquifier parameters undertransient and steady state conditions. 1. Maximum likelihood methodincorporating prior information, Water Resources Res. 22, No. 2 (Feb.1986), 199-210.
9. J. Carrera and S. P. Neuman, Estimation of aquifier parameters undertransient and steady state conditions. 3. Application to synthetic andfield data. Water Resources Res. 22, No. 2 (Feb. 1986), 228-242.
10. J. Carrera and S. P. Neuman, Estimation of aquifier parameters undertransient and steady state conditions. 2. Uniqueness, stability, andsolution algorithms, Water Resources Res. 22, No. 2 (Feb. 1986), 211-227.
11. K. Chou and A. Willsky, A multiresolution, probabilistic approach to2D inverse conductivity problems, Signal Process. 18, No. 3 (1989), 291-311.
12. K. C. Chou, “A Stochastic Modeling Approach to Multiscale Signal Processing,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1991.
13. K. C. Chou, S. A. Golden, and A. S. Willsky, “Multiresolution Stochastic Models, Data Fusion, and Wavelet Transforms,” Tech. Rep. LIDS-P-2110, MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, May 1992.
14. D. Colton and P. Monk, The inverse scattering problem for acoustic waves in an inhomogeneous medium, in “Inverse Problems in PartialDifferential Equations" (D. Colton, R. Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds.), Chap. 6, pp. 73-84, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.
15. I. Daubechies, Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets.Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 41 (1988), 909-996.
16. I. Daubechies, Wavelet on the interval, in “Progress in Wavelet Analysis and Applications" (Y. Meyer and S. Roques, Eds.), pp. 95-107, Frontieres, June 1992.
17. M. B. Dobrin, “Geophysical Prospecting,” McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
18. D. L. Donoho, Smooth wavelet decompositions with blocky coefficient kernels, in “Recent Advances in Wavelet Analysis,” (L. L. Schumaker and G. Webb, Eds.), pp. 259-308, Academic Press, 1994.
19. J. Feder, “Fractals,” Pergamon, New York, 1988.
20. A. Friedman and V. Isakov, On the uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problems with one measurement, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 38, No. 3 (1989), 563-579.
21. A. Friedman and M. Vogelius, Determining cracks by boundary measurements, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 38, No. 3 (1989), 527-556.
22. V. B. Glasko, "Inverse Problems of Mathematical Physics," American Institute of Physics, New York, 1984.
23. M. D. Greenberg, "Applications of Green’s Functions in Science and Engineering,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
24. L. J. Griffiths, F. R. Smolka, and L. D. Trembly, Adaptive deconvolution: A new technique for processing time-varying seismic data, Geophysics 42, No. 2 (June 1977), 742-759.
25. C. W. Groetsch, ‘The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind,” Pitman, Boston, 1984.
26. T. M. Habashy, W. C. Chew, and E. Y. Chow, Simultaneous reconstruction of permittivity and conductivity profiles in a radially inhomogeneous slab, Radio Sci. 21, No. 4 (July/Aug. 1986), 635-645.
27. T. M. Habashy and R. Mittra, On some inverse methods in electromagnetics, J. Electromagnetic Waves Appl. 1, No. 1 (1987), 25-58.
28. T. M. Habashy, E. Y. Chow, and D. G. Dudley, Profile inversion using the renormalized source-type integral equation approach, IEEE Trans.Antennas Propagation 38, No. 5 (May 1990), 668-682.
29. T. M. Habashy, R. W. Groom, and B. R. Spies, Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagneticscattering, J. Geophys. Res. 98, No. B2 (Feb. 1993), 1759-1775.
30. T. C. Halsey, M. H. Jensen, L. P. Kadanoff, I. Procaccia, and B. I.Shraiman, Phys. Rev. A 33 (1986), 1141.
31. B. K. P. Horn and B. Schunk, Determining optical flow, ArtificialIntelligence 17 (1981), 185-203.
32. A. Q. Howard, A Fourier method for borehole electromagnetic problems, Geophysics 51, No. 6 (June 1986), 1181-1190.
33. D. Isaacson and M. Cheney, Current problems in impedence imaging, in “Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations” (D. Colton, R.Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds.), Chap. 9, pp. 141-149, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990.
34. A. Q. Howard Jr., W. C. Chew, and M. C. Moldoveanu, A new correction to the Bom approximation, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 28, No. 3 (May 1990), 394-399.
35. T. G. Stockham Jr., T. M. Cannon, and R. B. Ingerbresten, Blind deconvolution through digital signal processing, Proc. IEEE 63, No.4 (Apr. 1975), 678-692.
36. A. C. Kak, Image reconstruction from projections, in “Digital Image Processing Techniques” (M. P. Ekstrom, Ed.), pp. 111-170, AcademicPress, New York, 1984.
37. A. C. Kak and M. Slaley, “Principles of Computerized Tomography Imaging,” IEEE Press, New York, 1987.
38. R. Kress, Numerical methods in inverse acoustic obstacle cattering, in “Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations” (D. Colton, R.Ewing, and W. Rundell, Eds.), Chap. 5, pp. 61-72, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1990.
39. R. Kress, "Linear Integral Equations," Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.
40. D. G. Laniotis, S. K. Katsikas, and S. D. Likothanassis, Optima seismic deconvolution, Signal Processing 15 (1988), 375-404.
41. M. R. Luettgen, W. C. Karl, and A. S. Willsky, Efficient multiscaleregularization with applications to the computation of optical flow, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 3, No. 1 (1994), 41-64.
42. M. R. Luettgen, W. C. Karl, A. S. Willsky, and R. R. Tenney, Multiscale representations of Markov random fields, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 41, No. 12 (1993), 3377-3396.
43. E. L. Miller, “The Application of Multiscale and Statistical Techniques to the Solution of Inverse Problems,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Aug.1994.
44. W. Munk and C. Wunch, Ocean acoustic tomography: A scheme for large scale monitoring, Deep Sea Res. A26 (1979), 123-161.
45. D. W. Olenburg, A comprehensive solution to the linear deconvolution problem, Geophys. J. Roy Astron. Soc. 65 (1981), 331-357.
46. D. S. Oliver, The averaging process in permeability estimation from well-test data, SPE Formation Evaluation (Sept. 1990), 319-324.
47. D. S. Oliver, Estimation of radial permeability distribution from well-test data, SPE Formation Evaluation (Dec. 1992), 290-296.
48. C. C. Paige and M. A. Saunders, LSQR: An algorithm for sparselinear equations and sparse least squares, ACM Trans. Math. Software8, No. 1 (Mar. 1982), 43-71.
49. D. Porter and D. S. Sterling, “Integral Equations," Cambridge Univ.Press, New York, 1990.
50. F. Santosa and W. S. Symes, Linear inversion of band-limited reflection seismograms, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Compul. 7, No. 4 (Oct. 1986), 1307-1330.
51. H. J. Scudder, Introduction to computer aided tomography, Proc.IEEE 66, No. 6 (June 1978), 628-637.
52. H. D. Simon, The Lanczos algorithm with partial reorthogonalization, Math. Comput. 42, No. 165 (Jan. 1984), 115-142.
53. E. Somersalo, G. Beylkin, R. Burridge, and M. Cheney, "Inverse Scattering Problem for the Schroedinger Equation in Three Dimensions:Connections between Exact and Approximate Methods,” res. note, Schlumberger-Dol! Research, 1991.
54. A. G. Tijhuis, “Electromagnetic Inverse Problems: Theory and Numerical Implementation,” VNU Science, Utrecht, 1987.
55. A. G. Tijhuis, Born-type reconstruction of material parameters of an inhomogeneous, lossy dielectric slab from reflected field data, WaveMotion 11 (1989), 151-173.
56. C. T. Verdin and T. M. Habashy, An approach to nonlinear inversion with applications to cross-well EM tomography, in “SEG AnnualInternational Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1993."
57. G. Wang, J. Zhang, and G. W. Pan, Solution of inverse problems inimage processing by wavelet expansions, IEEE Trans. Image Process.to appear.
58. G. W. Womell, A Karhuenen-Loeve-like expansion for 1 processes via wavelets, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 36 (July 1990), 859-861.
59. C. Wunch, Transient tracers as a problem in control theory, J. Geograph. Res. 93, No. C7 (July 15, 1988), 8099-8110.
60. A. E. Yagle and B. C. Levy, Application of the Schur algorithm to the inverse problems for a layered acoustic medium, J. Acoust. Soc.Amer. 76, No. 1 (July 1984), 301-308.