Automated Descriptor Selection for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Using Generalized Simulated Annealing

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 77-84

  Sutter, Jon M ^a   Dixon, Steve L ^a   Jurs, Peter C ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DESCRIBING FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELECTION;

AUTOMATED DESCRIPTOR SELECTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUASI NEWTON METHODS; SIMULATION ANNEALING;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 0029230341     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci00023a011     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. J. Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1979.
2. Free, S. M.; Wilson, J. W. A mathematical contribution to structureactivity studies. J. Med. Chem. 1964, 7, 395.
3. Gao, C.; Govind, R.; Tabak, M. H. Application of the group contribution method for predicting the toxicity of organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicol. Chem. 1992, 11, 631-636.
4. Zupan, J.; Gasteiger, J. Neural networks: A new method for solving chemical problems or just a passing phase? Anal. Chim. Acta 1991, 248, 1-30.
5. Borman, S. Neural network applications in chemistry begin to appear. Chem. Eng. News 1989, 67, 24-28.
6. Lacey, M. E. Neural network technology and its application in chemical research. Tet. Comp. Meth. 1990, 3, 119-128.
7. Wikel, J. H.; Dow, E. R. The use of neural networks for variable selection in QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 645-51.
8. Andrea, T. A.; Kalayeh, H. Applications of neural networks in quantitative structure-activity relationships of dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2824-2836.
9. Salt, D. W.; Salt, D. W.; Yildiz, N. The use of artificial neural networks in QSAR. Pesticide Sci. 1992, 36, 161.
10. Xu, L.; Ball, J. W.; Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Quantitative structureactivity relationships for toxicity of phenols using regression analysis and computational neural networks. Environmental Toxicol. Chem. 1994, 13(5), 841-851.
11. Aoyama, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Ichikawa, H. Neural networks applied to quantitative structure-activity relationships analysis. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 2583.
12. Livingstone, D. J.; Manallack, P. T. Statistics using neural networks: Chance effects. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1295-1297.
13. Schlick, T. Optimization methods in computational chemistry. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, B., Boyd, B., Eds.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1992; Vol. 3, Chapter 1.
14. Broyden, C. G. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms. J. Inst. Maths. Appl. 1970, 6, 76.
15. Fletcher, R. A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput. J. 1970, 13, 317.
16. Goldfarb, D. A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math. Comput. 1970, 24, 23.
17. Shannon, D. F. Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Math. Comput. 1970, 24, 647.
18. Fletcher, R. Practical Methods of Optimization, Vol. 1, Unconstrained Optimization; Wiley: New York, 1980.
19. Jansson, P. A. Neural networks: An overview. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 357A-362A.
20. Bohachevsky, I. O.; Johnson, M. E.; Stein, M. L. Generalized simulated annealing for function optimization. Technometrics 1986, 28, 209-217.
21. Kalivas, J. H.; Sutter, J. M.; Roberts, N. Global optimization by simulated annealing with wavelength selection for ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 2024-2030.
22. Kalivas, J. H. Generalized simulated annealing for calibration sample selection from an existing set and orthoginization of undesigned experiments. J. Chemometrics 1991, 5, 37-48.
23. Sutter, J. M.; Kalivas, J. H. Comparison of forward selection, backward elimination, and generalized simulated annealing for variable selection. Microchem. J. 1993, 47, 60-66.
24. Stuper, A. J.; Brugger, W. E.; Jurs, P. C. Computer-Assisted Studies of Chemical Structure and Biological Function; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1979.
25. Jurs, P. C.; Chou, J. T.; Yuan, M. In Computer-Assisted Drug Design; Olson, E. C., Christoffersen, R. E., Eds.; The American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1979; pp 103-129.
26. Stewart, J. P. P. MOP AC 6.0, Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange; Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, Program 455.
27. Stewart, J. P. P. Mopac: A semiempirical molecular orbital program. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1990, 4, 1.
28. Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Atomic charge calculations for quantitative structure-property relationships. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 492-504.
29. Abraham, R. J.; Griffiths, L.; Loftus, P. Approaches to charge calculations in molecular mechanics. J. Comput. Chem. 1982,3,407.
30. Fumival, G.; Wilson, R. Regression by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 1974, 16, 499-511.
31. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationship studies. Anal. Chem. 1990,62, 2323-2329.
32. Randić, M. On characterization of molecular branching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6609-6615.
33. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity Analysis; Research Studies Press Ltd.; John Wiley & Sons: 1986; pp 18-20.
34. Randié, M. Search for all self-avoiding paths for molecular graphs. Comput. Chem. 1979, 3, 5.
35. Belsley, D. A.; Kuh, E.; Welsch, R. E. Regression Diagnostics; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1980.
36. Vogel, A. I. Textbook of Organic Chemistry; Chaucer, 1977; p 1034.