Siting noxious facilities: Are markets efficient?

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1995, Pages S20-S33

  Ingberman, Daniel E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029200001     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1058     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. D. Epple, R. Filimon, and T. Romer, Equilibrium among local jurisdictions: Toward an integrated treatment of voting and residential choice, J. Public Econom. 24, 281-308 (1984).
2. W. A. Fischel, “The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls, ” Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore (1985).
3. J. Hamilton, Politics and social costs: Estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities, Rand J. Econom. 24, 101-125 (1993).
4. P. Hoel, S. Port, and C. Stone, “Introduction to Probability Theory, ” Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1971).
5. H. Kunreuther, P. Kleindorfer, P. Knez, and R. Yaksick, A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: Theory and experimental design, J. Environ. Econom. Management 14, 371-383 (1987).
6. J. Laing and B. Slotznick, The pits and the core: Simple collective decision problems with concave preferences, Public Choice 66, 229-242 (1990).
7. R. Mitchell and R. Carson, Property rights, protest, and the siting of hazardous waste facilities, Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 76, 285-290 (1986).
8. A. Nelson, J. Genereux, and M. Genereux, Price effects of landfills on house values, Land Econom. 68(4), 359-365 (1992).
9. M. O’Hare, L. Bacow, and D. Sanderson, “Facility Siting and Public Opposition, ” Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York (1983).
10. A. O’Sullivan, Voluntary auctions for noxious facilities: Incentives to participate and the efficiency of siting decisions, J. Environ. Econom. Management 25, s12-s26 (1993).
11. J. Opaluch, S. Swallow, T. Weaver, C. Wessells, and D. Wichelns, Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: Including, public preferences in current siting mechanisms, J. Environ. Econom. Management 24, 41-59 (1993).
12. A. M. Sullivan, Victim compensation revisited: Efficiency vs equity in the siting of noxious facilities, J. Public Econom. 41, 211-225 (1990).