How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction

Family Practice

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 32-36

  Greatbatch, David ^a   Heath, Christian ^b   Campion, Peter ^a   Luff, Paul ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; VIDEORECORDING;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; SELF DISCLOSURE; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0029069173     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.32     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bradley, P. Information Technology in General Practice: Some Guidelines for Introducing Computers into General Practice. Liverpool: Department of General Practice, University of Liverpool, 1989.
2. Royal College of General Practitioners. Computers in Primary Care: the Report of the Computer Working Party. Occasional Paper 13. London: RCGP, 1980.
3. Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A. Consultation Use of a Computer by General Practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract 1984; 34: 649–654.
4. Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G. Computer Assisted Screening: Effect on the Patient and His Consultation. Br Med J 1985; 290: 1709–1712.
5. Grealbatch D, Luff P, Heath C, Campion P. Interpersonal Communication and Human–Computer Interaction: An Examination of the Use of Computers in Medical Consultations. Interacting With Computers 1993; 5: 193–216.
6. Drew P, Heritage J (eds). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
7. Heath C. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
8. Heritage J. Explanations as Accounts: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. In Antaki C (ed.) Analysing Lay Explanations: A Casebook of Methods. London: Sage, 1988; pp 127–144.
9. Goodwin C. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
10. Atkinson JM, Heritage J (eds). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
11. Button G, Lee JRE (eds). Talk and Social Organisation. Avon: Multilingual Matters, 1986.
12. Boden D, Zimmerman DH (eds). Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
13. VAMP, personal communication.
14. Nazareth I, King M, Haines A, Rangel L, Myers S. Accuracy of Diagnosis of Psychosis on General Practice Computer System, Br Med J 1993; 307: 32–34.
15. Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerized data resource in the United Kingdom, Br Med J 1991; 302: 766–768.
16. Byrne PS, Long BEL. Doctors talking to patients. London: HMSO, 1976.