How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 247-260

  Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a   Edelman, Shimon Y ^b   Tarr, Michael J ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0029063252     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/5.3.247     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Armstrong SL, Gleitman LR, Gleitman H (1983) What some concepts might not be Cognition 12:263-308.
2. Barrow HG, Tenenbaum JM (1978) Recovering intrinsic scene characteristics from images. In: Computer vision systems (Hanson AR, Riseman EM, eds), pp 3-26. New York: Academic.
3. Bartram DJ (1974) The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognit Psychol 6:325-356.
4. Biederman I (1987) Recognition by components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol Rev 94:115-147.
5. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC (1993) Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 19:1162-1182
6. Biilthoff HH, Edelman S (1992) Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:60-64.
7. Biilthoff HH, Mallot HA (1988) Interaction of depth modules'stereo and shading. J Opt Soc Am 5:1749-1758.
8. Cave CB, Kosslyn SM (1993) The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception 22:229-248.
9. Cooper LA, Schacter DL (1992) Dissociations between structural and episodic representations of visual objects. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 1:141-146.
10. Cutzu F, Edelman S (1992) Report CS-TR 10, Viewpoint-dependence of response time in object recognition. Rehovot: Weizmann Institute of Science.
11. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley.
12. Edelman S (1991a) Report CS-TR 91-10, Features of recognition. Rehovot: Weizmann Institute of Science.
13. Edelman S (1991b) A network model of object recognition in human vision. In: Neural networks for perception, Vol 1 (Wechsler H, ed), pp 25-40. New York: Academic.
14. Edelman S (1992) Report CS-TR 92-17, Class similarity and viewpoint invariance in the recognition of 3D objects. Rehovot: Weizmann Institute of Science.
15. Edelman S, Biilthoff HH (1992a) Modeling human visual object recognition. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Congress on Neural Networks 1992, Vol 4, pp 37-42. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16. Edelman S, Biilthoff HH (1992b) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of 3D objects, Vision Res 32: 2385-2400.
17. Edelman S, Poggio T (1989) Representations in high-level vision reassessing the inverse ‘optics paradigm. In: Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp 944-949 San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
18. Edelman S, Poggio T (1992) Bringing the grandmother back into the picture: a memory-based view of object recognition. Int J Pattern Recog Artif Intell 6:37-62.
19. Edelman S, Weinshall D (1991) A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects. Biol Cybern 64:209-219.
20. Eley MG (1982) Identifying rotated letter-like symbols. Mem Cognit 10:25-32.
21. Ellis R, Allport DA, Humphreys GW, Collis J (1989) Varieties of object constancy. Q J Exp Psychol 41A:775-796.
22. Farah MJ, Rochlin R, Klein KL (1994) Orientation invariance and geometric primitives. Cognit Sci, in press.
23. Freeman H, Chakravarty I (1980) The use of characteristic views in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. In: Pattern recognition in practice (Gelsema ES, Kanal LN, eds), pp 277-288. New York: North-Holland.
24. Hummel JE, Biederman I (1992) Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol Rev 99:480-517.
25. Humphrey GK, Khan SC (1992) Recognizing novel views of threedimensional objects. Can J Psychol 46:170-190.
26. Intrator N, Gold JI, Biilthoff HH, Edelman S (1992) Three-dimensional object recognition using an unsupervised neural network: understanding the distinguishing features. In: Neural information processing systems, Vol 4 (Moody J, Hanson SJ, Lippman RL, eds), pp 460-467. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.
27. Jolicoeur P (1985) The time to name disoriented objects. Mem Cognit 13:289-303.
28. Jolicoeur P, Gluck M, Kosslyn SM (1984) Pictures and names: making the connection. Cognit Psychol 16:243-275
29. Koenderink JJ, van Doom AJ (1979) The internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision. Biol Cybern 32:211-216.
30. Koriat A, Norman J (1985) Mental rotation and visual familiarity. Percept Psychophys 37:429-439.
31. Lowe DG (1986) Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston: Kluwer.
32. Marr D (1982) Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
33. Marr D, Nishihara HK (1978) Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional structure. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 200:269-294.
34. Palmer SE, Rosch E, Chase P (1981) Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In: Attention and performance 9 (Long J, Baddeley A, eds), pp 135-151. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Perrett DI, Mistlin AJ, Chitty AJ (1989) Visual neurones responsive to faces. Trends Neurosci 10:358-364.
36. Poggio T, Edelman S (1990) A network that learns to recognize threedimensional objects. Nature 343:263-266.
37. Poggio T, Girosi F (1990) Regularization algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks. Science 247:978-982.
38. Rock I, DiVita J (1987) A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognit Psychol 19:280-293
39. Rock I, Wheeler D, Tudor L (1989) Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? Cognit Psychol 21:185-210.
40. Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit Psychol 8:382-439.
41. Schacter DL (1987) Implicit memory: history and current status. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn) 13:501-518.
42. Shepard RN, Cooper LA (1982) Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Sklar E, Biilthoff HH, Edelman S, Basri R (1993) Generalization of object recognition across stimulus rotation and deformation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 34.
44. Srinivas K (1993) Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn] 19:582-602.
45. Tarr MJ (1989) Orientation dependence in three-dimensional object recognition. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
46. Tarr MJ, Pinker S (1989) Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognit Psychol 21:233-282.
47. Tarr MJ, Pinker S (1990) When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered reference frame? Psychol Sci 1:253-256.
48. Tenenbaum JM, Fischler MA, Barrow HG (1981) Scene modeling: a structural basis for image description. In: Image modeling (Rosen- feld A, ed), pp 371-389. New York: Academic.
49. Thompson DW., Mundy JI. (1987) Three-dimensional model matching from an unconstrained viewpoint. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on robotics and automation, pp 208-220. Raleigh, NC: IEEE.
50. Tversky B, Hemenway K (1984) Objects, parts, and categories J Exp Psychol [Gen] 113:169-193.
51. UUman S (1989) Aligning pictorial descriptions: an approach to object recognition. Cognition 32:193-254.
52. UUman S, Basri R (1991) Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 13: 992-1005
53. Vetter T, Poggio T, Biilthoff HH (1994) The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Curr Biol 4:18-23.
54. Vetter T, Hurlbert A, Poggio T (1995) View-based models of 3D object recognition, invariance to imaging transformations. Cereb Cortex, in press.
55. Weinshall D, Werman M, Tishby N (1993) Stability and likelihood of views of three dimensional objects. In: Proceedings of the 10th Israeli Symposium on Computer Vision and AI (Basri R, Schild U, Stein Y, eds), pp 445-454.