Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white health plan members in Northern California

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 278-285

  Hiatt, Robert A ^a   Pérez Stable, Eliseo J ^b,c   Quesenberry, Charles ^a   Sabogal, Fabio ^b   Otero Sabogal, Regina ^b   McPhee, Stephen J ^b  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029028384     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1045     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Eddy D. ACS report on the cancer-related health checkup: Recommendations and rationale. CA Cancer J Clin 1980; 30:193-240.
2. National Cancer Institute (U.S.) Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. Working guidelines for early cancer detection: Rationale and supporting evidence to decrease mortality, December 17, 1987. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1988.
3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: An assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1989.
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives. Washington, DC: Public Health Service. DHHS publication no. (PHS) 91-50213.
5. Thomberry OT, Wilson RW, Golden PM. Health promotion data for the 1990 objectives: Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: United States, 1985. Ado Data 1986; 126:1-16.
6. Perkins Cl. Utilization of cancer screening in California, 1988-1991: Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, April, 1992.
7. Warnecke RB, Graham S. Characteristics of blacks obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Cancer 1976; 37:2015-2025.
8. Walter SD, Clarke EA, Hatcher J, Stitt LW. A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41:401-410.
9. Sawyer JA, Earp JA, Fletcher RH, Daye FF, Wynn TM. Accuracy of women’s self-report of their last Pap smear. Am J Public Health 1989; 79:1036-1037.
10. Michielutte R, Dignan MB, Wells HB, Bahnson J, Smith M, Wooten R, et al. Errors in reporting cervical screening among public health clinic patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44:403-408.
11. Bowman JA, Redman S, Dickinson JA, Gibberd R, Sanson-Fisher RW. The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: A methodological consideration in cervical screening research. Health Serv Res 1991; 26:97-107.
12. Mc Kenna MT, Speers M, Mallin K, Warnecke R. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories. Am J Prev Med 1992; 8:287-291.
13. Mc Kenna MT, Speers M, Mallin K, Warnecke R. A summary of the American Cancer Society Report to the Nation: Cancer in the poor. CA Cancer J Clin 1989; 39:263-265.
14. ADAMHA/NIH policy concerning inclusion of minorities in study populations. NIH Guide Grants Contracts 1991 Aug 23; 20(32): 2-3.
15. Perez-Stable EJ, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, Hiatt RA, McPhee SJ. Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. JAMA 1992; 268:3219-3223.
16. Perez-Stable EJ, Otero-Sabogal R, Sabogal F, McPhee SJ, Hiatt RA. Self-reported use of cancer screening tests among Latinos and Anglos in a pre-paid health plan. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:1073-1081.
17. Hiatt RA, Friedman GD. The frequency of kidney and urinary tract diseases in a defined population. Kidney Int 1982; 22:63-68.
18. Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health 1992; 92:703-710.
19. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:653-657.
20. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:566-570.
21. Hiatt RA, Bloom J. Cancer screening tests among blacks: Congruence between self-reports and medical record audits. 118th Annual Meeting, American Public Health Assoc., New York City, September 30-October 4, 1990.
22. Bureau of the Census. 1980 census of population and housing: Spanish surname list technical documentation. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Data Services Division, 1980.
23. Breslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. ARC Sci Publ 1980; 32:5-338.
24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
25. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981.
26. Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Chen EH, Dell J, Phillips CW. Do chart reviews and interviews provide the same information about breast and cervical cancer screening? Int J Epidemiol 1993; 22:393-397.
27. King ES, Rimer BK, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P. How valid are mammography self-reports? Am J Public Health 1990; 80:1386-1388.
28. Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114:657-661.
29. Mc Phee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 1991; 266:538-544.
30. Mc Phee SJ, Detmer WM. Office-based interventions to improve delivery of cancer prevention services by primary care physicians. Cancer 1993; 72(3 Suppl):1100-1112.