An optimal filtering technique to reduce the influence of lowfrequency noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions

British Journal of Audiology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 153-160

  Tognola, G ^a   Ravazzani, P ^a   Grandori, F ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

cross correlation; cross spectrum; detection of emissions; digital filtering; lowfrequency noise; transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLICK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL FILTERING; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTROSCOPY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; DEAFNESS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; OTOSCLEROSIS;

EID: 0029014049     PISSN: 03005364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03005369509086592     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Beauchamp K. G. Signal processing using analog and digital techniques. London: George Allen 1973.
2. Glaser E. M., Ruchkin D. S. Principles of neurobio-logical signal analysis. London: Academic Press, 1976; 447-50.
3. Grandori F., Ravazzani P. Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique. Br J Audiol 1993;27:97-102.
4. Kemp D. T., Bray P., Alexander L., Brown A. M. Acoustic emissions cochleography: practical aspects. In: Cianfrone G., Grandori F. (Eds)
5. Cochlear Mechanics and Otoacoustic Emissions. Scand Audiol 1986; Suppl. 25:71-95.
6. Lutman M. E. Reliable identification of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions using signal-processing techniques. Br J Audiol 1993; 27:103-8.
7. Ravazzani P., Grandori F. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: nonlinearities and response interpretation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 1993; 40: 500-4.
8. Tognola G., Ravazzani P., Grandori F. Reduction of lowfrequency noise in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. An optimal filtering approach. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Baltimore, Nov. 3-6,1994.
9. Vohr B. R., White K. R., Brancia Maxon A., Johnson M. J. Factors affecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions results in neonatal hearing screening. Semin Hear 1993; 14:57-72.
10. White K. R., Vohr B. R., Behrens T. R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Semin Hear 1993; 14; 18-29.