Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 339-346

  Hua, J ^a   Walker, P S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR SHAFT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAMEDULLARY NAILING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; STRAIN GAUGE TRANSDUCER; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0029012465     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100130307     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients
2. Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous‐coated hip replacement
3. Fit the patient to the prosthesis: an argument against the routine use of custom hip implants
4. An analysis of collar function and the use of titanium in femoral prostheses
5. Initial effect of collarless stem stiffness on femoral bone strain
6. Forces and moments along the human femur due to muscular activity
7. In vitro analysis of proximal femoral strains using PCA femoral implants and a hip‐abductor muscle simulator
8. Photoelastic coating techniques
9. Effects of ingrowth, geometry, and material on stress transfer under porous‐coated hip surface replacements
10. The effects of mechanical factors on biocompatibility tests
11. Experimental stress‐induced changes in growing long bones
12. Strain analysis of a femur with long stem press fit prosthesis
13. Accuracy of prediction of 3‐D femoral canal shape and custom stem design from plain X‐ray
14. Relative motion of hip stems under load: an in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs
15. Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty
16. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials
17. The photoelastic coating technique: its validation and use
18. Determination for bone mineral density by dual x‐ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty
19. Comparative study of cemented and cementless hip prostheses in the same patient
20. Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties: a study of autopsy‐retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling
21. Effect of embalming on the mechanical properties of beef bone
22. Cementless total hip arthroplasty
23. Adaptive changes in the femur after implantation of an Austin Moore prosthesis
24. The anatomic basis of femoral component design
25. Finite‐element‐analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis
26. Photoelastic stress analysis of the proximal femur after collared and collarless total hip replacement
27. Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip: a geometric study in cadavers
28. Finite element stress analysis of a push‐out test. Part 1: Fixed interface using stress compatible elements
29. Finite element stress analysis of a push‐out test. Part II: Free interface with nonlinear friction properties
30. Strains and micromotions of press‐fit femoral stem prostheses
31. Design and fabrication of cementless hip stems
32. Design analysis of press‐fit hip stems
33. Photoelastic coatings
34. Effect of press‐fit femoral stems on strains in the femur: a photoelastic coating study