A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device

Ergonomics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 816-827

  Akamatsu, Motoyuki ^a   Mackenzie, I Scott ^b   Hasbroucq, Thierry ^c  

^a NATL INST BIOSCI HUM TECHNOL   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Human computer interfaces; Multi modal mouse; Sensory feedback modalities; Tactile feedback

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COLOR; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; DATA DISPLAY; FEEDBACK; HUMAN; MICROCOMPUTERS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0028968972     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139508925152     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akamatsu, M. 1992, The influence of combined visual and tactile information on finger and eye movements during shape tracing. Ergonomics, 35,647-660.
2. Akamatsu, M. and Sato, S. 1994, A multi-modal mouse with tactile and force feedback, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 443-453.
3. Bliss, J. C, Katcher, M. H., Rogers, C. H. and Sheppard, R. P. 1970, Optical-to-tactile image conversion for the blind, IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, MMS-11, 58-65.
4. Card, S. K., English, W. K. and Burr, B. J. 1978, Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT, Ergonomics, 21, 601-613.
5. Chapanis, A. and Kinkade, R. G. 1972, Design of controls, in H. P. Van Cott and R. G. Kinkade (eds.), Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, 345-379, (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).
6. DiGiano, C. 1992, Program aurilization: Sound enhancements to the programming environment, Proceedings of Graphics interface '92,44-52 (Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto).
7. Fitts, P. M. 1954, The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
8. Gaver, W. 1989, The Sonic Finder: An interface that uses auditory icons, Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 67-94
9. Iwata, H. 1990, Artificial reality with force-feedback: Development of desktop virtual space with compact master manipulator, Computer Graphics, 24,165-170.
10. Mackenzie, I. S. 1992a, Movement time prediction in human-computer interfaces, Proceedings of Graphics Interface’92,140-150 (Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto).
11. Mackenzie, I. S. 1992b, Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction, Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 91-139.
12. Mackenzie, I. S. and Buxton, W. 1992, Extending Fitts’ law to two dimensional tasks, Proceedings of the CHI’92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 219-226 (ACM, New York).
13. Minski, M., Ouh-Young, M., Steele, O, Brooks, Jr., F. P. and Behensky, M. 1990, Feeling and seeing: Issues in force display, Computer Graphics, 24, 235-270.
14. Nelson, R. J., McCandlish, C. A. and Douglas, V.D. 1990, Reaction times for hand movements made in response to visual versus vibratory cues. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 7, 337-352.
15. Sorkin, R. D. 1987, Design of auditory and tactile displays, in G. Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, 549-576 (Wiley, New York)
16. Weber, G. 1990, FINGER: A language for gesture recognition, Proceedings of INTERACT’90, 689-694 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam).
17. Welford, A. T. 1968, The Fundamentals of Skill (Methuen, London).
18. Zimmerman, T. G, Lanier, J, Blanchard, C, Bryson, S. andHarvill, Y. 1987, A hand gesture interface device, Proceedings of the CHI + Gl '87 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 189-192 (ACM, New York)