Chromosomal distribution of the major satellite DNA of South American rodents of the genus ctenomys

Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue 3-4, 1995, Pages 179-184

  Rossi, Maria Susana ^a   Redi, C A ^b   Viale, G ^c   Massarini, A I ^a   Capanna, E ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME BANDING PATTERN; EVOLUTION; GENE MAPPING; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RODENT;

ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME BANDING; DNA, SATELLITE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPING; RODENTIA; SOUTH AMERICA; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0028955986     PISSN: 03010171     EISSN: 1424859X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000133956     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson S, Yates TL, Cook JA: Notes on Bolivian mammals. IV. The genus Ctenomys (Rodentia. Ctenomyidae) in the eastern lowlands. Am Mus Novitates 2891:1–20(1987).
2. Barros MA, Patton J: Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Tliomomys). Chromosoma 92:337–343(1985).
3. Burns J, Chan VT-W, Jonasson JA, Renting KA, Taylor S, McGee J: Sensitive system for visualising DNA probes hybridized in situ: rapid sex determination of intact cells. J clin Pathol 38:1085–1092 (1985).
4. Bush GL, Case S, Wilson AC, Patton JL: Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc natl Acad Sci, USA 74:3942–3946 (1977).
5. Cook JA, Anderson S, Yates TL: Notes on Bolivian mammals. VI. The genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae) in the highlands. Am Mus Novitates 2980:1–27(1990).
6. Feito R, Gallardo M: Sperm morphology of the Chilean species of Ctenomys (Octodontidae). J Mammal 63:658–661 (1982).
7. Finnegan DJ, Will BH, Bayev AA, Bowcock AM, Brown L: Transposable DNA sequences in eukaryotes, in Dover GA, Flavell RB (eds): Genome Evolution, pp 301–323 (Academic Press, London 1982).
8. Fredga K, Mandahl N: Autosomal heterochromatin in some carnivores, in Caspersson T (ed): Chromosome Identification, Nobel Symp No. 23, pp 104–107 (Academic Press, London 1972).
9. Gallardo M: Karvotvpic evolution in Ctenomys (Rodentia. Ctenomyidae). J Mammal 72:11–21 (1991).
10. Hamilton MJ, Honeycutt RL, Baker RJ: Intragenomic movement, sequence amplification and concerted evolution in satellite DNA in harvest mice Reitlirodontomys: evidence from in situ hybridization. Chromosoma 99:321–329 (1990).
11. Hamilton MJ, Hong G, Wichman HA: Intragenomic movement and concerted evolution of satellite DNA in Peromyscus: evidence from in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 60:40–44 (1992).
12. Jantsch M, Hamilton B, Mayr B, Schweizer D: Meiotic chromosome behaviour reflects levels of sequence divergence in Sus scrofa domestica satellite DNA. Chromosoma 99:330–335 (1990).
13. John B: The biology of heterochromatin. in Verma RS (ed): Heterochromatin: Molecular and Structural Aspects, pp 1–47 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988).
14. Lande R: Effective deme size during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33:234–251 (1979).
15. Lee A, Elder F: Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 26:36–40(1980).
16. Massarini AI: Evolución cromosómica de las especies de Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) de la región pampeana y de Cuyo. PhD thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires (1992).
17. Massarini AI, Barros MA, Ortells MO, Reig OA: Chromosomal polymorphism and small karvotypic differentiation in a group of Ctenomys species from Central Argentina (Rodentia. Octodontidae). Genetica 83:131–144(1991).
18. Meyne J, Baker RJ, Hebarf HH, Hsu TC, Ryder OA, Ward OG, Wiley JE, Wurster-Hill DH, Yates TL, Moyzis RK: Distribution of nontelomeric sites of the (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequence in vertebrate chromosomes. Chromosoma 99:3–10 (1990).
19. Nash WG, O’Brien SJ: A comparative chromosome banding analysis of the Ursidae and their relationship to other carnivores. Cytogenet Cell Genet 45: 206–212(1987).
20. Ortells MO: Biología evolutiva del género Ctenomys (Octodontidae. Rodentia). PhD thesis, Universidad de Buenos Aires (1990).
21. Ortells MO, Contreras J, Reig OA: New Ctenomys karyotypes (Rodentia, Octodontidae) from northeastern Argentina and from Paraguay confirm the chromosomal multiformity of the genus. Genetica 82:189–201 (1990).
22. Pardue ML: In situ hybridization, in Hames BD, Higgings SJ (eds): Nucleic Acid Hybridization, pp 179–202 (IRL Press, Oxford 1985).
23. Pathak S, Hsu TC, Arrighi FE: Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae). IV. The role of heterochromatin in karvotypic evolution. Cytogenet Cell Genet 12:31–36(1973).
24. Patton JL, Sherwood SW: Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Tliomomys). I. Heterochromatin variation and speciation potential. Chromosoma 100:3–7(1982).
25. Pescc CG, Rossi MS, Muro AF, Reig OA, Zorzopulos J, Kornblihtt AR: Binding of nuclear factors to satellite DNA of retroviral origin with marked differences in copy number among the species of the South American rodents of the genus Ctenomys. Nucl Acids Res 22:656–661 (1994).
26. Qumsiyeh MB, Sánchez-Hernández C. Davis SK. Patton JL, Baker RJ: Chromosomal evolution in Geomys as revealed by G- and C-band analysis. Southwest Naturalist 33:1–13(1988).
27. Redi CA. Garagna S, Delia Valle G, Bottiroli G, DeH’Orto P, Viale G. Peverali FA, Raimondi E, Forejt J: Differences in the organization and chromosomal allocation of satellite DNA between the European long tailed house mice Mus domesticus and Mus museulus. Chromosoma 99:11–17 (1990a).
28. Redi CA, Garagna S, Zuccotti M: Robertsonian chromosome formation and fixation: the genomic scenario. Biol J Linn 41:235–255 (1990b).
29. Reig OA: Karyotypic repatterning as a triggering factor in cases of explosive speciation, in Fontdevila A (ed): Evolutionary Biology of Unstable Populations, pp 246–289 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1989).
30. Reig OA, Busch C, Ortells MO, Contreras J: An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology and speciation in Ctenomys. in Nevo E, Reig OA (eds): Evolutionary Biology of Subterranean Mammals, pp 71–96 (Alan R Liss, New York 1990).
31. Reig OA, Kiblisky P: Chromosome multiformity in the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Chromosoma 28:211–244 (1969).
32. Reig OA, Ortells MO, Massarini AI, Barros MA, Tiranti S, Dyzenchauz F: New karyotypes and C-banding patterns of the subterranean rodents of the genus Ctenomys (Caviomorpha. Octodontidae) from Argentina. Mammalia 56:603–623(1992).
33. Rossi MS, Pesce CG, Reig OA, Kornblihtt AR, Zorzópulos J: Retroviral-like features in the monomer of the major satellite DNA from the South American rodents of the genus Ctenomys. DNA Seq 3:379–382 (1993a).
34. Rossi MS, Reig OA, Zorzópulos J: Evidence of rolling-circle replication in a major satellite DNA from the South American rodents of the genus Ctenomys. Mol Biol Evol 7:340–350(1990).
35. Rossi MS, Reig OA, Zorzópulos J: A major satellite DNA from the South American rodents of the genus Ctenomys: Quantitative and qualitative differences in species with different geographic distributicn. Z Säugetierk 58:244–251 (1993b).
36. Ruedas LA, Cook JA, Yates, TL, Bickham LA: Conservative genome size evolution in a chromosomally variable family of rodents (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Genome 36:449–458 (1993).
37. Schweizer D, Loidl J: A model for heterochromatin dispersion and evolution of C-band patterns. Chrom Today 9:61–74 (1987).
38. Sumner, AT: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Expl Cell Res 75: 304–306(1972).
39. Viegas-Péquignot E. Dutrillaux B, Prod’Homme M, Petter F: Chromosomal phylogeny of Muridae: a study of ten genera. Cytogenet Cell Genet 35:269–278(1983).
40. Vitullo AD, Cook JA: The role of sperm morphology in the evolution of tuco-tucos (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae): confirmation of results from Bolivian spccics. Z Saugetierk 56:359–364 (1991).
41. Vitullo AD, Roldán ERS, Merani MS: On the morphology of spermatozoa of tuco-tucos, Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae): new data and its implications for the evolution of the genus. J Zool, Lond 215:675–683(1988).
42. Walsh JB: Persistence of tandem arrays: implications for satellite DNA and simple-scquence DNAs. Genetics 115:553–567 (1987).
43. Wichman HA, Payne CT, Ryder OA, Hamilton MJ, Maltbie M, Baker RJ: Genomic distribution of heterochromatic sequences in equids: implications to rapid chromosomal evolution. J Hered 82:369–377(1991).
44. Wilson AC, Sarich VM, Maxson LR: The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc natl Acad Sci, USA 71: 3028–3030(1974).