Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 228-232

  Green, Josephine M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Institute for Social Studies in Medical Care   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSULTANTS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TIME FACTORS; WALES;

EID: 0028946164     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09099.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy
2. Who's for amniocentesis? The politics of prenatal screening.
3. Screening for neural‐tube defects and maternal anxiety
4. Ethics and late termination of pregnancy
5. Serum screening for Down's syndrome: the experiences of obstetricians in England and Wales
6. Pregnant women's attitudes to abortion and prenatal screening. J
7. A critical evaluation of sonar crown‐rump length measurements
8. Gynaecologists' attitudes to abortion
9. Serum screening for Down's syndrome: some women's experiences