A comparison of conventional culture and three rapid methods for the detection of Salmonella in poultry feeds and environmental samples

Letters in Applied Microbiology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 89-91

  Quinn, Colette ^b   Ward, J ^a   Griffin, M ^a   Yearsley, D ^a   Egan, J ^a  

^a Central Veterinary Research Laboratory Castleknock Ireland   (Ireland)

^b DUBLIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES;

DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DUST SAMPLES; ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEED SAMPLES; HYBRIDIZATION METHODS; IMPEDANCE METHOD; MALTHUS; POULTRY FEEDS; RAPID METHOD;

SALMONELLA;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; DNA HYBRIDIZATION; DUST; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; NONHUMAN; POULTRY; SALMONELLA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SALMONELLA;

EID: 0028931202     PISSN: 02668254     EISSN: 1472765X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01293.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. A comparison of an enzyme immunoassay, DNA hybridization, antibody immobilization, and conventional methods for recovery of naturally occurring salmonellae from processed broiler carcasses
2. Colorimetric deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization assay for rapid screening of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study
3. Comparison of colorimetric monoclonal enzyme immunoassay screening methods for detection of Salmonella in foods
4. Automated conductance method for the detection of Salmonella in foods: collaborative study
5. Reproductability of electrical conductance assay results for the detection of salmonella