Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 286-292

  Lerman, Caryn ^a   Lustbader, Edward ^b   Rimer, Barbara ^c   Daly, Mary ^b   Miller, Suzanne ^d   Sands, Colleen ^b   Balshem, Andrew ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CONCEPT;

ADULT; ANXIETY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0028910223     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.4.286     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures-1994. Atlanta: ACS, 1994
2. Sanin RW, Rubin GL, Webster LA, et al: Family history and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 253:1908-1913, 1985
3. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD: Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 73:643651, 1994
4. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being screened annually [see comment citations in Medline], J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879-1886, 1989
5. Russell C: Hype, hysteria, and women’s health risks: the role of the media. Women’s Health Issues 3 191-197, 1993
6. Lerman C, Schwartz M: Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 28:145-155, 1993
7. Lerman C, Kash K, Stefanek M: Young women at increased risk for breast cancer perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 16:171-176, 1994
8. Kash KM, Holland JC, Halper MS, et al: Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer [see comment citations in Medline]. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:24-30, 1992
9. Lerman C, Daly M, Sands C, et al: Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:1074-1080, 1993
10. Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, et al: Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12.843-850, 1994
11. Stefanek ME: Counseling women at high risk for breast cancer. Oncology (Huntingt) 4:27-38, 1990
12. Kelly PT: Understanding Breast Cancer Risk. Philadelphia: Temple Umv Press, 1991
13. Lerman C, Rimer BK, Daly M, et al: Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3:271-276, 1994
14. Lerman C, Rimer BK, Engstrom PF: Cancer risk notification: psychosocial and ethical implications. J Clin Oncol 9:1275-1282, 1991
15. Redelmeier DA, Rozin P, Kahneman D: Understanding patients’ decisions. Cognitive and emotional perspectives [see comment citation in Medline], JAMA 270:72-76, 1993
16. Tversky A, Kahneman D: Judgments of and by representativeness. In Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Umv Press, 1982
17. Hayward RS, Steinberg EP, Ford DE, et al: Preventive care guidelines: 1991 [published erratum appears in Ann Intern Med 115:332, 1991]. Ann Intern Med 114:758-772, 1991
18. Bethesda, Md: Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, et al: Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1450-1459, 1991
19. Bemchou J: A computer program for estimating individualized probabilities of breast cancer [published erratum appears in Comput Biomed Res 27:81, 1994], Comput Biomed Res 26:373-382, 1993
20. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W: Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41:209-218, 1979
21. Evans DG, Burnell LD, Hopwood P, et al: Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 67:612-614, 1993
22. Daly MB, Lemian C. Sands CB, et al: Breast cancer risk factors are underestimated among high risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 27:177, 1993
23. Wine J: Test anxiety and direction of attention. Psych Bull 76:92-104, 1971
24. Weinstein ND, Sandman PM: Some criteria for evaluating risk messages. Risk Anal 13:103-114, 1993
25. Bondy ML, Lustbader ED, Halabi S, et al: Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history [see comment citation in Medline], J Natl Cancer Inst 86:620-625, 1994
26. Spiegelman D, Colditz GA, Hunter D, et al: Validation of the Gail et al. model for predicting individual breast cancer risk [see comment citation in Medline]. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:600-607, 1994
27. Gail MH, Benichou J: Assessing the risk of breast cancer in individuals. In Cancer Prevention (DeVita VT Jr, Heilman S, Rosenberg SA, eds). Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1992, pp 1-15
28. Lerman C, Croyle R: Psychological issues in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Arch Intern Med 154:609-616, 1994
29. Miki Y, Swensen J, Shalluck-Eidens P, et al: A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 266:6671, 1994
30. Wooster R, Neuheusen SL, Mangion J. et al: Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q 12-13. Science 265:2088-2090, 1994