Mouse Otx2 functions in the formation and patterning of rostral head

Genes and Development

Volumn 9, Issue 21, 1995, Pages 2646-2658

  Matsuo, Isao ^a   Kuratani, Shigeru ^a   Kimura, Chiharu ^a,b   Takeda, Naoki ^a   Aizawa, Shinichi ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

cranial neural crest; head development; homeo box; Otocephaly; Otx; segmental patterning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE MUTATION; GROWTH REGULATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMEOBOX; HOMOZYGOSITY; MOUSE; NEURAL CREST; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0028895055     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.9.21.2646     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allis, E.P. 1923. Are the polar and trabecular cartilages of vertebrate embryos the pharyngeal elements of the mandibular and premandibular arches? J. Anat. 58: 37-51.
2. Altman, J. and S.A. Bayer. 1986. The development of the rat hypothalamus. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 100: 1-177.
3. Ang, S.-L., R.A. Conlon, O. Jin, and J. Rossant. 1994. Positive and negative signals from mesoderm regulate the expression of mouse Otx2 in ectoderm explants. Development 120: 2979-2989.
4. Bergquist, H. 1932. Zur Molphologie des Zwishenhirns bei niederen Wierbeltieren. Acta Zool. 13: 57-303.
5. Boer, P.H., H. Potten, C.N. Adra, K. Jardine, G. Mullhofer, and M.W. McBurney. 1990. Polymorphisms in the coding and noncoding regions of murine pgk-1 alleles. Biochem. Genet. 28: 299-307.
6. Cantu, J.M. 1978. Dominant inheritance of holoprosencephaly. Birth Defects 14: 215-220.
7. Chisaka, O. and M.R. Capecchi. 1991. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.5. Nature 350: 473-479.
8. Cohen, M.M. Jr. 1989. Perspectives on holoprosencephaly. Part I. Epidemiology, genetics, and syndromology. Teratology 40: 211-236.
9. Condie, B.G. and M.R. Capecchi. 1994. Mice with targeted disruptions in the paralogous genes hoxa-3 and hoxd-3 reveal synergistic interactions. Nature 370: 304-307.
10. Cottrall, K., I. Magrath, and J.A.H. Bootes. 1981. A case of proximal 14 trisomy with pathological findings. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 25: 1-6.
11. Couly, G.F., P.M. Coltey, and N.M. Le Douarin. 1993. The triplet origin of skull in higher vertebrates: A study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117: 409-429.
12. Davis, C.A., S.E. Noble-Topham, J. Rossant, and A.L. Joyner. 1988. Expression of the homeo box-containing gene En-2 delineates a specific region of the developing mouse brain. Genes & Dev. 2: 361-371.
13. de Beer, G.R. 1931. On the nature of trabecula cranii. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 74: 701-731.
14. _. 1937. The development of the vertebrate skull. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Evans, H.E. 1979. Reproduction and prenatal development. In Miller's anatomy of the dog (ed. H.E. Evans and G.C. Christensen), pp. 13-17. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
16. Figdor, M.C. and C.D. Stern. 1993. Segmental organization of embryonic diencephalon. Nature 363: 630-634.
17. Finkelstein, R. and N. Perrimon. 1991. The molecular genetics and head development in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 112: 899-912.
18. Finkelstein, R., D. Smouse, T.M. Capaci, A.C. Sprading, and N. Perrimon. 1990. The orthodenticle gene encodes a novel homeo domain protein involve in the development of the Drosophila nervous system and ocellar visual structures. Genes & Dev. 4: 1516-1527.
19. Gans, C. and R.G. Northcutt. 1983. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: A new head. Science 220: 268-274.
20. Goodrich, E.S. 1930. Structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan, London, UK.
21. Hamburger, V. 1961. Experimental analysis of the dual origin of the trigeminal ganglion in the chick embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 148: 91-124.
22. Herrmann, B.G. 1991. Expression pattern of the brachyury gene in whole-mount Twis/Twis mutant embyos. Development 113: 913-917.
23. Ingham, P.W. 1988. The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature 335: 25-34.
24. Juriloff, D.M., K.K. Sulik, T.H. Roderick, and B.K. Hogan. 1985. Genetic and developmental studies of a new mouse mutation that produces otocephaly. J. Craniofacial Genet. Dev. Biol. 5: 121-145.
25. Kastury, K., T. Druck, K. Huebner, C. Barletta, D. Acampora, A. Simeone, A. Faiella, and E. Boncinelli. 1994. Chromosome locations of human EMX and OTX genes. Genomics 22: 41-45.
26. Kelly, W.L. and M.M. Bryden. 1983. A modified differential stain for cartilage and bone in whole mount preparations of mammalian fetuses and small vertebrates. Stain Technol. 58: 131-134.
27. Kessel, M. and P. Gruss. 1990. Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell 61: 301-308.
28. Kuratani, S. 1989. Development of the orbital region in the chondrocranium of Caretta caretta. Reconsideration of the vertebrate neurocranium configuration. Anat. Anz. 169: 335-349.
29. Le Douarin, N. 1982. The neural crest. Development and cell biology series; 12. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
30. Little, C.C. and H. Bagg. 1924. The occurrence of four inheritable morphological variations in mice and their possible relation to treatment with X-rays. J. Exp. Zool. 41: 45-91.
31. Lufkin, T., A. Dierich, M. Lemeur, M. Mark, and P. Chambon. 1991. Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66: 1105-1119.
32. Lumsden, A., N. Sprawson, and A. Graham. 1991. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113: 1281-1291.
33. Marshall, A.M. 1882. Segmental value of cranial nerves. J. Anat. Physiol. 16: 305-354.
34. McGinnis, W. and R. Krumlauf. 1992. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283-302.
35. Nada, S., T. Yagi, H. Takeda, T. Tokunaga, H. Nakagawa, Y. Ikawa, M. Okada, and S. Aizawa. 1993. Constitutive activation of src family kinases in mouse embryos that lack csk. Cell 73: 1125-1135.
36. Noden, D.M. 1983. The role of the neural crest in patterning of avian cranial skeletal, connective, and muscle tissues. Dev. Biol. 96: 144-165.
37. _. 1984. The use of chimeras in analyses of craniofacial development. In Chimeras in developmental biology (ed. N. LeDouarin and A. McLaren), pp. 241-280. Academic Press, London, UK.
38. Osumi-Yamashita, N., Y. Ninomiya, H. Doi, and K. Eto. 1994. The contribution of both forebrain and midbrain neural crest cells to the mesenchyme in the frontonasal mass of mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 164: 409-419.
39. Piatt, J. 1945. Origin of the mesencephalic V root cells in Amblystoma. J. Comp. Neurol. 82: 35-54.
40. Puelles, L. and L.R. Rubenstein. 1993. Expression patterns of homeobox and other putative regulatory genes in the embryonic mouse forebrain suggest a neuromeric organization. Trends Neurosci. 16: 472-479.
41. Rijli, F.M., M. Mark, S. Lakkaraju, A. Dierich, P. Dollé, and P. Chambon. 1993. Homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 75: 1333-1349.
42. Romer, A.S. and T.S. Parsons. 1949. The vertebrate body. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.
43. Shawlot, W. and R.R. Behringer. 1995. Requirement for Lim1 in head-organizer function. Nature 374: 425-430.
44. Simeone, A., D. Acampora, M. Gulisano, A. Stornaiuolo, and E. Boncinelli. 1992. Nested expression domains of homeobox genes in developing rostral brain. Nature 358: 687-690.
45. Simeone, A., D. Acampora, A. Mallamaci, A. Stornaiuolo, M.R. D'Apice, V. Nigro, and E. Boncinelli. 1993. A vertebrate gene related to orthodenticle contains a homeodomain of the bicoid class and demarcates anterior neuroectoderm in the gastrulating mouse embryo. EMBO J. 12: 2735-2747.
46. Sulik, K.K., M.C. Johnston, and M.A. Webb. 1981. Fetal alcohol syndrome: Embryogenesis in a mouse model. Science 214: 936-938.
47. Sundin, O. and G. Eichele. 1990. A homeo domain protein reveals the metameric nature of the developing chick hindbrain. Genes & Dev. 4: 1267-1276.
48. Tan, S.S. and G.M. Morriss-Kay. 1985. The development and distribution of the cranial neural crest in the rat embryo. Cell Tiss. Res. 240: 403-416.
49. Weinberg, E. 1928. The mesencephalic root of the fifth nerve a comparative study. J. Comp. Neurol. 46: 249-405.
50. Wilkinson, D.G. 1993. In situ hybridization. In Essential developmental biology: A practical approach (ed. C.D. Stern and P.W.H. Holland), pp. 257-274. IRL Press, Oxford, UK.
51. Wilkinson, D.G., S. Bhatt, P. Charvrier, R. Bravo, and P. Charnay. 1989. Segment specific expression of a zinc finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337: 461-464.
52. Windle, W.F. and M.F. Austin. 1936. Neurofibrillar development in the central nervous system of chick embryos up to 5 days' incubation. J. Comp. Neurol. 63: 431-463.
53. Wright, S. and K. Wagner. 1934. Types of subnormal development of the head from inbred strains of guinea pigs and their bearing on the classification and interpretation of vertebrate monsters. Am. J. Anat. 54: 383-447.
54. Yagi, T., T. Tokunaga, Y. Furuta, S. Nada, M. Yoshida, T. Tsukada, Y. Saga, N. Takeda, Y. Ikawa, and S. Aizawa. 1993a. A novel ES cell line, TT2, with high germline-differentiating potency. Anal. Biochem. 214: 70-76.
55. Yagi, T., S. Nada, N. Watanabe, H. Tamemoto, N. Kohmura, Y. Ikawa, and S. Aizawa. 1993b. A novel negative selection for homologous recombinants using diphtheria toxin A fragment gene. Anal. Biochem. 214: 77-86.