Checkpoint genes required to delay cell division in response to nocodazole respond to impaired kinetochore function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 1995, Pages 6838-6844

  Wang, Yanchang ^a   Burke, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOCODAZOLE;

ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CENTROMERE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG MECHANISM; MITOSIS INHIBITION; MITOSIS RATE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

MAMMALIA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0028881021     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.12.6838     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, A. E. M., and J. R. Pringle. 1984. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild type and morphogenetic mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 98:934-945.
2. Andreassen, P. R., and R. L. Margolis. 1991. Induction of partial mitosis in BHK cells by 2-aminopurine. J. Cell Sci. 100:299-310.
3. Andreassen, P. R., and R. L. Margolis. 1994. Microtubule dependence of p34(CDC2) inactivation and mitotic exit in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 127:789-802.
4. Burke, D., P. Gasdaska, and L. Hartwell. 1989. Dominant effects of tubulin overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:1049-1059.
5. Cottarel, G., J. H. Shero, P. Hieter, and J. H. Hegemann. 1989. A 125-basepair CEN6 DNA fragment is sufficient for complete meiotic and mitotic centromere functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:3342-3349.
6. DeBrabander, M. J., R. M. L. Vande Veire, F. E. M. Aerts, M. Borgers, and P. A. J. Janssen. 1976. The effect of methyl(5-(2-thienylcarbonyl)-1H-benzimidazole-2-yl)carbamate (R17934; NSC 238159), a new synthetic antitumoral drug interfering with microtubules on mammalian cells cultured in vitro. Cancer Res. 36:905-916.
7. Doheny, K. F., P. K. Sorger, A. A. Hyman, S. Tugendreich, F. Spencer, and P. Hieter. 1993. Identification of essential components of the S. cerevisiae kinetochore. Cell 73:761-774.
8. Earnshaw, W. C., R. L. Bernat, C. A. Cooke, and N. F. Rothfield. 1991. Role of the centromere/kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 56:675-685.
9. Goh, P., and J. V. Kilmartin. 1993. NDC10: a gene involved in chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 121:503-512.
10. Gorbsky, G. J., and W. A. Ricketts. 1993. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122: 1311-1321.
11. Hegemann, J. H., J. H. Shero, G. Cottarel, P. Philippsen, and P. Hieter. 1988. Mutational analysis of centromere DNA from chromosome VI of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2523-2535.
12. Hoyt, M. A., L. Totis, and B. T. Roberts. 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66:507-517.
13. Hyman, A. A., K. Middleton, M. Centola, T. J. Mitchison, and J. Carbon. 1992. Microtubule-motor activity of a yeast centromere-binding protein complex. Nature (London) 359:533-536.
14. Jacobs, C. W., A. E. M. Adams, P. J. Szaniszlo, and J. R. Pringle. 1988. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J. Cell Biol. 107:1409-1426.
15. Jiang, W., J. Lecher, and J. Carbon. 1993. Isolation and characterization of a gene (CBF2) specifying a protein component of the budding yeast kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 121:513-519.
16. Jordan, M. A., D. Thrower, and L. Wilson. 1991. Mechanism of inhibition of cell proliferation by vinca alkaloids. Cancer Res. 51:2212-2222.
17. Jordan, M. A., D. Thrower, and L. Wilson. 1992. Effect of vinblastine, podophyllotoxin and nocodazole on mitotic spindles: implication for the rate of microtubule dynamics in mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 102:401-416.
18. Jordan, M. A., R. J. Toso, D. Thrower, and L. Wilson. 1993. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentralions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9552-9556.
19. Jordan, M. A., and L. Wilson. 1990. Kinetic analysis of tubulin exchange at microtubule ends at low vinblastine concentrations. Biochemistry 29:2730-2739.
20. Kilmartin, J. V., and A. E. Adams. 1984. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J. Cell Biol. 98:922-933.
21. Kubiak, J. Z., M. Weber, H. D. Pennart, N. J. Winston, and B. Maro. 1993. The metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes is controlled through microtubule-dependent destruction of cyclin B in the presence of CSF. EMBO J. 12: 3773-3778.
22. Lechner, J. 1994. A zinc finger protein, essential for chromosome segregation, constitutes a putative DNA binding subunit of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore complex Cbf3. EMBO J. 13:5203-5211.
23. Lechner, J., and J. Carbon. 1991. A 240 kD multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64:717-725.
24. Li, R., and A. W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66:519-531.
25. Li, X., and R. B. Nicklas. 1995. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature (London) 373:630-632.
26. Ng, R., and J. Carbon. 1987. Mutational and in vitro protein-binding studies on centromere DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:4522-4534.
27. Owellen, R. J., C. A. Hartke, R. M. Dickerson, and F. O. Hains. 1976. Inhibition of tubulin-microtubule polymerization by drugs of the vinca alkaloid class. Cancer Res. 36:1499-1502.
28. Rieder, C. L., A. Schultz, R. Cole, and G. Sluder. 1994. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 127:1301-1310.
29. Rowinsky, E. K., and R. C. Donehower. 1991. The clinical pharmacology and use of antimicrotubule agents in cancer chemotherapeutics. Pharmacol. Ther. 52:35-84.
30. Sherman, F., G. Fink, and J. B. Hicks. 1986. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
31. Sorger, P. K., F. F. Severin, and A. A. Hyman. 1994. Factors required for the binding of reassembled yeast kinetochores to microtubules in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 127:995-1008.
32. Spencer, F., S. L. Gerring, C. Connelly, and P. Hieter. 1990. Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 124:237-249.
33. Spencer, F., and P. Hieter. 1992. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 8908-8912.
34. Strunnikov, A. V., J. Kingsbury, and D. Koshland. 1995. CEP3 encodes a centromere protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 128:749-760.
35. Tavormina, P. Personal communication.
36. Tomkiel, J., C. A. Cooke, H. Saitoh, R. L. Bernat, and W. C. Earnshaw. 1994. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 125:531-545.
37. Toso, R. J., M. A. Jordan, K. W. Farrell, B. Matsumoto, and L. Wilson. 1993. Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamic instability in vitro by vinblastine. Biochemistry 32:1285-1293.
38. Wang, X., N. Yew, J. G. Peloquin, G. F. Vandewoude, and G. G. Borisy. 1994. Mos oncogene product associates with kinetochores in mammalian somatic cells and disrupts mitotic progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:8329-8333.
39. Wendell, K. L., L. Wilson, and M. A. Jordan. 1993. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J. Cell Sci. 104:261-274.
40. Zirkle, R. E. 1970. Involvement of the prometaphase kinetochore in prevention of precocious anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 47:235a.