A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 169, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 208-213

  Ortega, Adrian E ^a   Hunter, John G ^b   Peters, Jeffrey H ^a   Swanstrom, Lee L ^c   Schirmer, Bruce ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ADULT; APPENDECTOMY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOBILIZATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STAPLER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VOMITING; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0028843580     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80138-X     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by southern U.S. surgeons
2. Endoscopic appendectomy
3. Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine
4. The diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis with laparoscopic methods
5. A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
6. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomized trial
7. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a prospective evaluation
8. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy