Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: The Liverpool diabetic eye study

BMJ

Volumn 311, Issue 7013, 1995, Pages 1131-

  Harding, S P ^a   Broadbent, D M ^a   Neoh, C ^a   White, M C ^a   Vora, J ^a  

^a University Hospital   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYDRIASIS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SLIT LAMP;

AMBULATORY CARE; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; ENGLAND; EYE DISEASES; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URBAN HEALTH; VISION SCREENING; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0028822418     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1131     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Savolainen EA Lee QP. Diabetic retinopathy–need and demand for photocoagulation and its cost-effectiveness: evaluation based on services in the United Kingdom. Diabetologia 1982; 23: 138–40.
2. Rohan TE Frost CD Wald NJ. Prevention of blindness by screening for diabetic retinopathy: a quantitative assessment. BMJ 1989; 299: 1198–201.
3. Kohner EM Barry PJ. Prevention of blindness in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 1984; 26: 173–9.
4. Javitt JC Canner JK Sommer A. Cost effectiveness of current approaches to the control of retinopathy in type I diabetics. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 255–64.
5. Foulds W McCuish A Barrie T Green F Scobie IN Ghafour IM, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in the West of Scotland: its detection and prevalence, and cost-effectiveness of a proposed screening programme. Health Bull 1983; 41: 318–26.
6. Sussman EJ Tsurias WG Sarper KA. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA 1982; 247: 3231–4.
7. Department of Health and Social Security. Causes of blindness and partial sight among adults in 1976/77 and 1980/81 England. London: HMSO, 1988.
8. Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. DRS Group #8. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1981; 88: 583–600.
9. Lee CM Olk RJ. Modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Long-term visual results. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 1594–602.
10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987; 27: 265–72.
11. Wareham N Greenwood R. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic fundus photography. Diabet Med 1991; 8: 607–8.
12. Buxton MJ Sculpher MJ Ferguson BA Humphreys JE Altman JFB Spiegelhalter DJ, et al. Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods. Diabet Med 1991; 8: 371–7.
13. Williams R Nussey S Humphry R Thompson G. Assessment of nonmydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 1986; 293: 1140–2.
14. Moss SE Klein R Kessler SD Richie KA. Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 62–7.
15. Mohan R Kohner EM Aldington SJ Nijhar I Mohan V Mather HM. Evaluation of a non-mydriatic camera in Indian and European diabetic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1988; 72: 841–5.
16. Klein R Klein BEK Neider MW Hubbard LD Meuer SM Brothers RJ. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 485–91.
17. Burns-Cox CJ Dean Hart JC. Screening of diabetics for retinopathy by ophthalmic opticians. BMJ 1985; 290: 1052–4.
18. Taylor R Lovelock L Tunbridge WMG Alberti KGMM Brackenridge RG Stephenson P, et al. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1990; 301: 1243–7.
19. Ryder REJ Vora JP Atiea JA Owens DR Hayes TM Young S. Possible new method to improve detection of diabetic retinopathy: Polaroid nonmydriatic retinal photography. BMJ 1985; 291: 1256–7.
20. Schacat AP Hyman L Leske MC Connell AMS Hiner C Javornik N, et al. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photograph gradings. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111: 1064–70.
21. Kinyoun JL Martin DC Fujimoto WY Leonetti DL. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 1888–93.
22. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs–an extension of the Modified Airlie House Classification. ETDRS Report #10. Ophthalmology 1991; 98: 786–806.
23. Altman DG Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 1994; 308: 1552.
24. Leese GP Ahmed S Newton RW Jung RT Ellingford A Baines P, et al. Use of mobile screening unit for diabetic retinopathy in rural and urban areas. BMJ 1993; 306: 187–9.
25. Sparrow JM McLeod BK Smith TDW Birch MK Rosenthal AR. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy and their risk factors in the non-insulin-treated diabetic patients of an English town. Eye 1993; 7: 158–63.
26. Protocol for screening for diabetic retinopathy in Europe. Diabet Med 1991; 8: 263–7.
27. Kohner EM. Detecting diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 1991; 302: 176.
28. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Color photography vs fluorescein angiography in the detection of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1344–51.
29. Ellingford A. Diabetic photographic eye screening using a mobile unit in Tayside, Scotland. J Audiov Media Med 1992; 15: 104–7.
30. Ryder REJ Young S Vora JP Atiea JA Owens DR Hayes TM. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using Polaroid retinal photography through undilated pupils. Practical Diabetes 1985; 2: 34–9.
31. Rogers D Bitner-Glindzicz M Harris C Yudkin JS. Non-mydriatic retinal photography as a screening service for general practitioners. Diabet Med 1990; 7: 165–7.
32. Jones D Dolben J Owens DR Vora JP Young S Creagh FM. Nonmydriatic Polaroid photographs in screening for diabetic retinopathy; evaluation in a clinical setting. BMJ 1988; 296: 1029–30.
33. Finlay R Griffiths J Jackson G Law D. Can general practitioners screen their own patients for diabetic retinopathy? Health Trends 1991; 23: 104–5.
34. Awh CC Javitt JC Chong LP Gehrs KM Gusman GI Street DA, et al. Ophthalmoscopic diagnosis and referral of diabetic eye disease by primary care physicians. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 713.
35. Gehrs KM Chong LP Guzman G Street DA Awh C Cupples H, et al. Can we educate primary care physicians about diabetic retinopathy after graduation? Preliminary results of the diabetic retinopathy education study. ARVO abstract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 1182.
36. Correspondence. Detecting diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 1991; 302: 174–6.
37. Forrest RD Jackson CA Yudkin JS. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. Comparison of a nurse and doctor with retinal photography. Diabetes Res 1987; 5: 39–42.
38. Kleinstein RN Roseman JM Herman WH Holcombe J Louv WC. Detection of diabetic retinopathy by optometrists. J Am Optom Assoc 1987; 58: 879–82.
39. Jacob J Stead J Sykes J Taylor D Tooke JE. A report on the use of technician ophthalmoscopy, combined with the use of the Canon nonmydriatic camera in screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community. Diabet Med 1995; 12: 419–25.
40. Ryder REJ. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 1995; 311: 207–8.
41. WHO/IDF Europe. Diabetes care and research in Europe: the St Vincent declaration. Diabet Med 1990; 7: 360.