Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: Update

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 54-

  Maio, Angela ^a   Rifkin, Matthew D ^a  

^a ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATITIS; REVIEW;

HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0028813329     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: 15361004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002142-199500710-00007     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Boring CC, Squires TS. Tong T, Montgomery S. Cancer statistics I'm. Cancer 1994;44:7-26.
2. Montie JE. Wood DP Jr. Pontes JE, Levin HB, Boyett J. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate identified by serial sectioning of the prostate after cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: a prospective study. J Urol 1988; 139:315A.
3. Troncoso P, Babaian RJ. Ro JY, Grigon FJ, von Eschenbach AC. Ayala AG. Prostatic intracpithelial neoplasia ami invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma in cvstoprostatcctomv patients. Urology 1989;34:52-6.
4. Dhom G. Epidemiologic aspects of latent and clinically manifest carcinoma of the prostate. J Cancer Res Clm Omul1983:106:210-8.
5. Scott R Jr. Mulchnik CL., Laskowski I Z, Schmalhorst WR. Carcinoma of the prostate in elderly men: incidence, growth characteristics and clinical significance. J I rot 1969; 101:602-7.
6. Lowsley OS. Embry ology, anatomy and surgery of the prostate gland. AmJSurg 1940:8:526-41.
7. McNeal JE. The prostate gland. Monogr I rol 1984,4:3-33.
8. McNeal JE. Normal anatomy of the prostate and changes in benign prostatic hypertrophy and carcinoma. Sanin I'hrasottmlCompul lomgr Magn Res 1988.0:320-44
9. Catalona WJ. Prostate cancer L'nrr I’rohl Snrg 1940; 27:495-461.
10. Blute ML. Zincke H. Farrow G 1 ong term follow-up of young patients with stagexadenocarcinoma of the prostate. J L rol 1986:146:840-4.
11. Epstein JL. Pauli G. Eggleston JC. ct al. Prognosis of untreated stage AI prostalic carcinoma: a study of 04 cases w ith extended follow-up. J L rol 1986:146:847-0
12. Ramchandam P. Schnall MD Magnetic imaging of the prostate. Semin Renlgenol 1994:1:74-82
13. Flanash K.A. ltz DC. Cook EN. et al. Carcinoma of the prostate: a 15 year follow-up. Jurol 1972:107:450-4.
14. Jewett HJ. The present status of radical prostatectomy of stages A&B prostate cancer. Irol Clin Xorih I in 1975:2:105-12.
15. Walsh PI. Mostwin JL. Radical prostatectomy and cystopros-tatectomy with preservation of potency: results using a new nerve-spanning technique. BrJL'rol 1984:56:604-7
16. Middleton RG. Smith J A. Melzer RB. Hamilton PE. Patient survival and local recurrence rate following radical prostatectomy for proslatic carcinoma J Lrol 1986:146:422-4.
17. McNeil BJ. Rationale for the use of bone scan in selected metastatic and primary bonetumors. Semin Xuel Med 1978:8:346.
18. Sukov RJ. Scardino PT. Sample WF. Winter J. Confer DJ. Computed tomography and transabdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of the prostate. J Compul Assist 1'omogr 1977:1: 281-9.
19. Platt JF. Bree RL. Schwab RE. The accuracy of CT in the staging of the prostate. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149:415-8.
20. Levine MS. Arger PH. Coleman BG. Mulhern CB, Pollack HM. Wein AJ. Detecting lymphatic metastases from prostatic carcinoma: superiority ofCT Am J Roentgenol 1981; 147:207-211.
21. Weinerman PM. Arger PH. Coleman BG. Pollack HM. Banner MP. Wein AJ Pelvic adenopathy from bladder and prostate carcinoma: detection by rapid sequence computed tomography Am J Roentgenol 1983:140:95-9.
22. Shinohara K. Wheeler T. Scardino PT The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Crol 1989; 142:76-82.
23. Rifkin MD. Dahnert W. Kurt AB. State of the art: endorectal sonography of the prostate gland AJR 1990; 154:691-700
24. Salo JO. Kivisaari L. Rannikko S, et al. Computerized tomography and transrectal ultrasound in the assessment of local extension of prostatic cancer before retropubic radical prostatectomy. JCrol 1987; 137:435-8.
25. Andriole GL. Kavowssi LR, Torrence RJ, et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of the prostate Jurol 1988:140:758-60.
26. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA, cl al. Comparison of MRI in staging early prostate cancer: results of a cooperative trial. Engl J Med 1990; 323:621 -6.
27. Quinn SF, Franzini DA, Demlow TA, et al. MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: correlation with whole-mount specimens. Radiology 1994:190: 323-7.
28. Ihickman D. Miller GJ, Hopper KD, Raifc M. Prostate cancer: comparison ol preoperative 0.45T MRI with whole mount his-topatliologv. Miign Res I mug 1990:8:205-11.
29. Carroll PR. Sugimura K. Cohen MB. Hricak H. Detection and staging of prostate carcinoma after transurethral resection or open enucleation of the prostate: accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging. J urol 1992:147:402-6.
30. Martin JF. Hajck P. Baker I., et al. Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology 1988; 167:268-70.
31. Schnall MD. Ienkinski RE, Pollack HM. et al. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil Radiology 1989; 172: 570-4.
32. Schnall MD, Connick T. Hayes CL. et al. Imaging of the pelvis with an endorectal-external multicoil array. J Magn Res lmag 1992;2:229-32.
33. Schnall MD. Pollack HM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate gland, L rol Radiol 1990:12:109-14.
34. Rifkin MD. MRI of the prostate. Cm Rev Dtagn lmag 1990;31:223-61.
35. Piccoli CW, Rifkin MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and bladder. Top Magn Res lmag 1990:2:51-66.
36. Walsh PC, Danker PJ. Impotence following radical proslatec-tomv: insight into etiology and prevention. J urol 1982:128: 492-7.
37. Phillips ME, Kressel HY. Spritzer LE. et al. Normal prostate and adjacent structures: MR imaging at I.5T. Radiology 1987;164:381-5.
38. Hricak H, Dooms GC. McNeal JE. et al. MR imaging of the prostate gland: normal anatomy. AJR 1987; 148:51-8.
39. Sommer GF. McNeal JE. Carrol CL. MR depiction of zonal anatomy of the prostate at I.5T. J Compul Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:983-9.
40. Bryan PJ. Butler HE. Nelson AD. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. AJR 1985:146:543-8.
41. Listerud J. Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. Axel L. The correction of nonuniform signal intensity problems in magnetic resonance imaging. J Digit lmag 1989:2:2-8.
42. Scheibler ML. Tomaszewski JE. Bezzi M. et al. Prostate carcinoma and benign prostatic hy perplasia: correlation of high-res-olution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1989; 172: 131-7.
43. Way WG. Brown JJ. Lee JKT. et al. MR imaging of benign prostatic hypertrophy using a Helmholz-lype surface coil. Magn Res lmag 1992; 10:341-9.
44. Buonocore E. Hesemann C. Pavlicek W. Montie JE. Clinical and in vitro magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic carcinoma. AJR 1984; 144:1267-72
45. Nghiem LIT. Kellman GM. Sandberg SA. Craig BM Cystic lesions of the prostate. Radiograplnes 1990; 10:645-50.
46. Gevenois PA. Van Sinoy ML. Sint/oflSA, Stallcnberg B. Cysts of the prostate and seminal vesicles: MR findings in I I cases. AJR 1990; 155:1021-4.
47. Schnall MD. Pollack HM. Van Arsdalen K. Kressel HY. The seminal tract in patients with ejaculatory dy sfunction: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. AJR 1892; 159:447-41.
48. Carrol CL, Sommer EG. McNeal JE. Stanley TA The abnormal prostate: MR imaging at I 5T with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1987; 164:521 -5
49. Phillips ML, Kressel IIY. Spritzer CE. et al. Prostatic disorders: MR imagingat 1.51. Radiology 1987; 164:486-92.
50. Kahn T. Biirrig K. Schmitx-Drager B. et al. Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1989; 174:847-51.
51. Bezzi M, Kressel H Y. Allen K. et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imagingat 1.51. Radiology 1988; 169:439-46.
52. Quint LE. Van Erp JS, Bland PH, et al. Prostate cancer: corre-lalion of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radioiogv 1991; 179:817-42.
53. Ellis JH, Tempany C, Sarin MS, Galsonis C. Rifkin MD, McNeil B.I. MR imagingand sonography of early prostatie can-eer: pathologic and imaging features that intluenee identification and diagnosis. AJR 1994; 162:866-78.
54. Sehiebler ML, Sell null MD, Pollack HM, et al. Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenoeareinoma of the prostate Radiology 1991; 184:119-52.
55. Mirowit SA, Brown J.I. lleiken IP. Evaluation of the prostate and prostatie carcinoma with gadolinium enhanced endorectal coil imaging. Radiology 1991; 186:151-7.
56. Seheibler ML. Sehnall MD. Outwatcr E. MR imaging of mucinous adenoeareinoma of the prostate. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:491-4
57. Outwatcr E, Seheibler ML. Tomasszewski JE, et al. Mucinous carcinomas involving the prostate: atypical findings at MR imaging. JMagn Res Imag 1992;2:597-600.
58. Sehnall MD. Tomaszewski J. Pollack HM. et al. The bulging prostate gland: a sign of capsular involvement. J Magn Res limit; 1991; 1:274.
59. Tempany CM. Rhamouni AD. Epstein JL. et al. Invasion of the neurovascular bundle by prostate cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 181:107-12.
60. Hricak H, Dooms GC, Jeffrey RB. et al. Prostatie carcinoma: staging bv clinical assessment. CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 162:111-6.
61. Friedman AC. Siedman EJ, Radecki PD, et al. Relative merits of MRI. transrectal endosonography and CT in diagnosis and staging of carcinoma of the prostate. Urology 1988; 11:510-7.
62. Poon PY. McCallum RW, Henkelman MM. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Radiology 1985; 154:141-9.
63. Biondetti PR, Lee JKT, Ling D, Catalona WJ. Clinical stage B prostate carcinoma: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 1987;162:125-9.
64. Mukamcl E, Hannah J, Barbaric Z, de Kernion JB. The value of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging prostatie carcinoma: comparison with clinical and histological staging. J Urol 1986; 136:1231-3.
65. Sehnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J. et al. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178:797-802.
66. Tempany CM, Zhou X. Zerhouni EA. et al. Staging of prostate cancer with MRI: results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project: comparison of three MRI techniques, including the endorectal coil. AJR 1994; 192:47-54.
67. Chan TW. Kressel HY. Prostate and seminal vesicles after radiation: MR appearance. JMagn Res Imag 1991; 1:503-513.
68. Mirowitz SA. Seminal vesicles: biopsy-related hemorrhage simulating tumor invasion at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:373-6.
69. McNeal JE. Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: relationship to local and distant spread. Hum Pathol 1992;23:258-66.
70. Quint LE. Van Erp JS. Bland PH. et al. Carcinoma of the prostate: MR images obtained with body coils do not accurately reflect tumor volume. AJR 1991:156:511-6.
71. McSherry SA. Levy F. Seheibler ML. et al. Preoperative prediction of pathologic tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Jurot 1991:146:85-9.
72. Sommer GF. Nghiem HV. Herfkms R. et al. Determining the volume for prostatie carcinoma: value of MR imaging with an external-array coil. AJR 1991:161:81 -6.