Optimum method for urinary drainage in major abdominal surgery: A prospective randomized trial of suprapubic versus urethral catheterization

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 1995, Pages 1367-1368

  O'Kelly, T J ^a   Mathew, A ^a   Ross, S ^b   Munro, A ^a  

^a RAIGMORE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLADDER ASPIRATION; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; URETHRA; URINE CATHETER;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BALLOON DILATATION; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URINARY CATHETERIZATION;

EID: 0028806268     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800821024     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. How large a sample?
2. Prospective randomized controlled trial of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization
3. Measurement of pain
4. Prospective randomised trial of two devices for suprapubic catheterisation in general surgical patients
5. Acute urinary retention: which catheter?