|
|
|
Volumn 632, Issue , 1994, Pages 326-335
|
|
In re Baby Boy Doe.
[No Author Info available]
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
VIABILITY;
ARTICLE;
CESAREAN SECTION;
COMPETENCE;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW;
FETUS;
FETUS DEVELOPMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
ILLNESS BEHAVIOR;
IN RE BABY BOY DOE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
MATERNAL WELFARE;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PREGNANCY;
PRIVACY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
PROGNOSIS;
RELIGION;
RISK;
RISKS AND BENEFITS;
STALLMAN V. YOUNGQUIST;
STATE INTEREST;
UNITED STATES;
COMPETENCE;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
ILLINOIS;
IN RE BABY BOY DOE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL RIGHTS;
MATERNAL HEALTH;
MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RISKS AND BENEFITS;
STALLMAN V. YOUNGQUIST;
STATE INTEREST;
VIABILITY;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
FETAL VIABILITY;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
ILLINOIS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
MATERNAL WELFARE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
PREGNANCY;
PRIVACY;
PROGNOSIS;
RELIGION;
RISK;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
|
|
EID: 0028765093
PISSN: 0275262X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (7)
|
|
References (0)
|