A clone by any other name is still an ethical concern.

Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 271, Issue 5, 1994, Pages 331-332

  Voelker, R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AMERICAN FERTILITY SOCIETY; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CELL CLONE; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; CLONING; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ETHICS; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; NATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD ON ETHICS IN REPRODUCTION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; RESEARCH; STANDARD; TISSUE CULTURE; TWIN PREGNANCY; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN FERTILITY SOCIETY; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL APPROACH/SOURCE; CLONING; EMBRYO RESEARCH; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; NATIONAL ADVISORY BOARD ON ETHICS IN REPRODUCTION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH; TWINNING; UNITED STATES;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CLONE CELLS; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ETHICS; HUMAN; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); RESEARCH; TISSUE CULTURE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0028758969     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.271.5.331     Document Type: Article

References (0)