Mini-Markers: A Brief Version of Goldberg's Unipolar Big-Five Markers

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 506-516

  Saucier, Gerard ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; SELF EVALUATION;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0028726219     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: 15327752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Block. J. (in press). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin.
2. Burisch, M. (1984). You don't always get what you pay for: Measuring depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales Journal of Research in Personality, 18. 81-98.
3. DuBois, P. H. (1970) Varieties of psychological test homogeneity. American Psychologist, 25, 532-536.
4. Goldberg. L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59. 1216-1229.
5. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment. 4, 26-42.
6. Goldberg, L. R. & Rosolack, T. K. (1994). The Big-Five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck's P-E-N model. In C. F. Halverson. G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7-35). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
7. Hampson, S. E., Goldberg. L. R. & John, O. P. (1987). Category-breadth and social-desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality, 1, 241-258.
8. Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B. & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality.’ and Social Psychology, 63. 146-163.
9. Johnson, J. A., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five-factor model with the abridged Big Five dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563-576.
10. Loevinger, J. (1954). The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 493-504.
11. Parker, J. D. A., Bagby, R. M., & Summerfeldt, L. J. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 463-466.
12. Saucier, G, (1992). Benchmarks: Integrating affective, and interpersonal circles with the Big-Five personality factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1025-1035.
13. Saucier, G. (1994). Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 141-154.
14. Tucker, L. R. (1946). Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items. Psychometrika, 11, 1-13.