|
Volumn 5, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 303-309
|
Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AUTONOMY;
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH;
ARTICLE;
COST CONTROL;
COSTS AND BENEFITS;
DISADVANTAGED;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
JUSTICE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT (OBRA) 1989;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
VALUES;
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH;
AUTONOMY;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
COSTS AND BENEFITS;
DISADVANTAGED;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
JUSTICE;
OMNIBUS BUDGET RECONCILIATION ACT (OBRA) 1989;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
UNITED STATES;
VALUES;
CONFLICT OF INTEREST;
COST CONTROL;
ETHICAL REVIEW;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HEALTH POLICY;
HUMAN;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY;
|
EID: 0028696099
PISSN: 10467890
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (0)
|