|
|
|
Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 609-719
|
|
Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
DEMENTIA;
EMPATHY;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
HUMAN;
IN RE CONROY;
IN RE QUINLAN;
IN RE SPRING;
IN RE STORAR;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LIVING WILL;
LONG TERM CARE;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
MENTAL STRESS;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SELF CONCEPT;
STANDARD;
THEORETICAL MODEL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
IN RE CONROY;
IN RE QUINLAN;
IN RE SPRING;
IN RE STORAR;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
AGED;
DECISION MAKING;
DEMENTIA;
EMPATHY;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FAMILY;
FREEDOM;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
MODELS, THEORETICAL;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SELF CONCEPT;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0028676812
PISSN: 00360465
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (64)
|
|
References (0)
|
