The treatment of landscape in project appraisal: Consumption and sustainability approaches

Project Appraisal

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 110-118

  Bowers, John ^a   Hopkinson, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Landscape; Project appraisal; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION APPROACH; ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION; LANDSCAPE CONSIDERATION; PROJECT APPRAISAL; SUSTAINABILITY APPROACH;

EID: 0028569848     PISSN: 02688867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02688867.1994.9726938     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. John Bowers (1992), “Pricing the environment: a critique”, Inter-national Review of Applied Economics, 7(1), pages 91-107.
2. J Bowers, P Hopkinson and A Palmer (1992), Roads 2. The Implementation of Sustainability in the Roads Programme, report to English Nature (Public Policy Unit, School of Econ-omic Studies, University of Leeds).
3. J Bowers, P Hopkinson and K Lyall (1993), Environmental Stan-dards: Issues for the Countryside Commission (Environmental Policy Unit, School of Business and Economic Studies, Univer¬sity of Leeds).
4. John B Braden and Charles D Kolstad (editors) (1991), Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality (North Holland).
5. B S Brookshire, B C Ives and W D Schulze (1976), “The valuation of aesthetic preferences", Journal of Environmental Econo-mics and Management, 3, pages 325-346.
6. Countryside Commission (1991), Assessment and conservation of landscape character, The Warwickshire Landscapes Project approach (Countryside Commission Publications, Manchester).
7. K D Hnes (1968), “Landscape evaluation: a research project in East Sussex”, Regional Studies, 2, pages 41-55.
8. N Hanley and S Craig (1991), “Wilderness development decisions and the Krutilla-Rsher Model: the case of Scotland’s 'How Country'”, Ecological Economics, 4, pages 145-64.
9. W Michael Hanneman (1991), “Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?”, American Economic Review, 81 (3).
10. Land Use Consultants (1991), Landscape Assessment Principles and Practice, report for the Countryside Commission for Scotland.
11. D L Linton (1968), "The assessment of scenery as a natural resource", Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84-85, pages 219¬238.
12. P B McLeod (1984), “The demand for local amenity: an hedonig price analysis”, Environment and Planning A, 16, pages 389-400.
13. C Nash and J Bowers (1988), “Alternative approaches to the valuation of environmental resources", in R Kerry Turner (1988).
14. Nature Conservancy Council (1989), Guide-lines for Selection of Biological SSSI's (Peterborough).
15. T O’Riordan, C Wood and A Shadrake (1990), Paper presented at National Interpreters Workshop, Charleston, North Carolina.
16. David Pearce, Edward Barbier and Anil Markandya (1990), Sus¬tainable Development. Economics and Environment in the Third World (Earthscan, London).
17. Colin Price (1978), Landscape Economics (MacMillan, London).
18. R D Rowe, R C D’Arge and D S Brookshire (1980), "An experiment on the economic value of visibility”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 7, pages 1-19.
19. R Kerry Turner (editor) (1988), Sustainable Environmental Man¬agement. Principles and Practice (Belhaven Press).
20. United Kingdom Climate Change Review Group (UKCCRG) (1990), First Report, The Potential Effects of Climate Change in the United Kingdom (Department of the Environment, HMSO).
21. R G Walsh, J B Loomis and R A Gillman (1984), “Valuing option, existence and bequest values for wilderness", Land Econo¬mics, 60, pages 14-29.
22. K Willis, G Garrod and I Dobbs (1990), “The value of canals as a public good: the case of the Montgomery and Lancaster Canals”, Working Paper 5, ESRC Countryside Change Initiative.