Evaluating environmental plan quality: The case of planning for sustainable development in new zealand

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 155-169

  Berke, Philip R ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN; PLAN QUALITY; QUALITY EVALUATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 0028551025     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640569408711967     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berke, P. & Beatley, T. (1992) Planning for Earthquakes: Risk, Policy and Politics (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).
2. Berke, P. (1993) A method for evaluating plan quality: a pilot study of local and regional plans in New Zealand, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the New Zealand Planning Institute (Auckland),
3. Berke, P.R. & French, S.P. (forthcoming) The influence of state planning mandates on local plan quality, Journal of Planning Education and Research.
4. Burby, R., French, S.P. and others (1985) Floodplain Land Use Management: A National Assessment (Boulder, CO, Westview Press).
5. Burby, R. & Dalton, L. (forthcoming) Plans can matter!: the role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas, Public Administration Review.
6. Carley, M. & Christie, I. (1993) Managing Sustainable Development. (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).
7. Clark, T. (1992) The state-local nexus in growth management: is bottom-up better, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (Columbus, Ohio).
8. Connerly, C. & Muller, N. (1993). Evaluating housing elements in growth management comprehensive plans, in: J. Stein (Ed) Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990s (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
9. Dixon, J. (1993) The integration of EIA and planning in New Zealand: changing process and practice, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 36, pp. 239–251.
10. Ericksen, N. (1986) Creating Flood Disasters? (Wellington, National Water and Soil Conservation Authority).
11. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (1989) National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: Phase 2, report on the Activity Weighting Forum (FEMA, Washington, DC).
12. Fishman, R. (Ed) (1978) The state of the art in local planning, in: Housing for All Under Law: New Directions in Housing, Land Use, and Planning Law, report of the American Bar Association, Advisory Committee on Housing and Urban Growth (Ballinger, MA).
13. Godschalk, D., Brower, D. & Beatley, T. (1989) Catastrophic Coastal Storms (Durham, NC, Duke University Press).
14. Kaiser, E. J., Godschalk, D. & Chapin, F.S. (forthcoming) Urban Land Use Planning, 4th edition (Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press).
15. Kent, T.J. (1990) The Urban General Plan (Chicago, American Planning Association).
16. Knapp, G. (1992) Evaluating land use programs: structured thoughts and research strategy, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (Columbus, Ohio).
17. Marshall, T. (1993) Regional environmental planning: progress and possibilities in Western Europe, European Planning Studies, 1, pp. 11–26.
18. May, P. & Handmer, J. (1992) Regulatory policy design: cooperative versus deterrent mandates, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51 (March), pp. 43–53.
19. Memon, P.A. (1991) Shaking off a colonial legacy—town and country planning in New Zealand, 1870s to 1980s, Planning Perspectives, 6, pp. 19–32.
20. Miles, M. & Huberman, A.M. (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
21. Mileti, D. (1980) Human adjustment to the risk of environmental extremes, Sociology & Social Research, 64, pp. 327–347.
22. Miller, A. (1993) Global environmental issues, in: Global Environmental Issues and Sustainability: Proceedings (Wellington, Ministry for the Environment).
23. Ministry for the Environment (MfE) (1991) Guide to the Resource Management Act: An Outline of the Resource Management Act Explaining the Direction Being Taken by Each Section of the Act (Wellington, MfE).
24. Ministry for the Environment (1993a) Resource Management Ideas: Urban Sustainability, Report No. 5 (Wellington, MfE).
25. Ministry for the Environment (1993b) Resource Management Act: Section 24, Monitoring Report (Wellington, MfE).
26. Mitchell, K. (1992) Natural hazards and sustainable development, paper presented at the Natural Hazards Research and Applications Workshop (Boulder, CO, University of Colorado).
27. Montz, B. & Dixon, J. (1993) From law to practice: EIA in New Zealand, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 13, pp. 1–20.
28. New Zealand Planning Institute (1993) Building a Sustainable Future—A Partnership Approach: Conference Proceedings (Auckland, NZPI).
29. Pitkin, S. (1992) Comprehensive plan format: a key to impacting decision making, Environmental & Urban Issues, 19(4), pp. 8–10.
30. Shepard, R.B., Blakely, J.P., Hastie, W.D., Smith, W.D. & Van Dissen, R.J. (1991) Recent developments in earthquakes forecasting and hazard mitigation measures in New Zealand, paper presented at the International Seminar on Earthquake and Hazard Mitigation Technology (Tokyo).
31. Sitarz, D. (Ed) (1993) Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet (Covelo, CA, Island Press).
32. Taranaki Regional Council (1991) Preliminary Hazard Analysis (Stratford, TRC).
33. Wenger, D., James, T. & Faupel, C. (1980) Disaster Beliefs and Emergency Planning (New York, Irvington).
34. White, G. (1945) Human adjustments to floods, Research paper no. 29 (University of Chicago, Department of Geography).
35. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our Common Future (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
36. Wyner, A. & Mann, D. (1986) Preparing for California's Earthquakes: Local Government and Seismic Safety (Berkeley, University of California, Institute of Governmental Studies).