Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: Full-sib mating

Heredity

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 363-372

  Hedrick, Philip W ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Captive breeding; Full sib mating; Genetic load; Inbreeding depression; Lethals

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DOMINANT GENE; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HOMOZYGOTE; INBREEDING; LETHAL GENE; MALE; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR; VERTEBRATE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ALLELES; ANIMAL; FEMALE; GENES, DOMINANT; GENES, LETHAL; HOMOZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTORS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; VARIATION (GENETICS); VERTEBRATES;

EID: 0028519058     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1994.183     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BARRETT, S. C. H. and CHARLESWORTH D. 1991. EffectS of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load.Nature, 352, 522-524.
2. BITTLES, A. H., MASON, W. M., GREENE, J. and RAO, N. A. 1991. Reproductive behavior and health in consanguineousmarriages. Science, 252, 789-794.
3. BOWMAN, J. c. and FALCONER, D. s. 1960. Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice. Genet. Res., 1,262-274.
4. BROWN, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 15,1-42.
5. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and BODMER, W. F. 1971. The Genetics of Human Populations. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
6. CHARLESWORTH, D. and CHARLESWORTH, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Ann. Rev.Ecol.Syst., 18, 237-268.
7. CHARLESWORTH, D., MORGAN, M. T. and CHARLESWORTH, B. 1992. The effect of linkage and population size on inbreedingdepression due to mutational load. Genet. Res., 59,49-61.
8. CROW, J. F. and Kimura, M. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper and Row, New York.
9. DARWIN, c. R. 1868. Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. John Murray, London.
10. DARWIN, c. R. 1876. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murray, London.
11. EHIOBU, N. G., GODDARD, M. E. and TAYLOR, J. F. 1989. Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophilamelanogaster. Theor. Appl. Genet., 77, 123-137.
12. FRANKLIN, I. R. 1980. Evolutionary changes in small populations. In: Soule, M. E. and Wilcox, B. A. (eds) Conservation Biology, pp. 135-149. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
13. HALDANE, J. B. s. 1937. Some theoretical results of continued brother-sister mating. J. Genet., 34, 265-274.
14. HEDRICK, p. w. 1985. Genetics of Populations. Jones and Bartlett, Boston.
15. HEDRICK, p. w. 1990. Mating systems and evolutionary genetics. In: Wohrmann, K. and Jain, S. (eds) PopulationBiology: Ecological and Evolutionary Viewpoints, pp.83-114. Springer, New York.
16. HEDRICK, p. w. and MILLER, p. s, 1992. Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol Appl, 2, 30-46.
17. KIMURA, M. and MARUYAMA, T. 1966. The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics, 54,1337-1351.
18. LACY, R. c. 1992. The effects of inbreeding on isolated populations: are minimum viable population sizes predictable? In: Fiedler, R L and Jain, S. K. (eds) Conservation Biology:the Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management, pp. 277-296. Chapman and Hall, New York.
19. Lande, R. and Barrowclough, G. F. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soule, M. E. (ed.) Viable Populations for Conservation, pp. 87-123. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. LERNER, I. M. 1954. Genetic Homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
21. LYNCH, M. and GABRIEL, W. 1990. Mutation load and the survival of small populations. Evolution, 44,1725-1737.
22. MARiNKovic, D. 1967. Genetic loads affecting fecundity in natural populations of D. pseudoobscura. Genetics, 56,61-71.
23. MILLER, p. s. and HEDRICK, p. w. 1993. Inbreeding and fitness in captive populations: lessons from Drosophila. Zoo Biol,12,333-352.
24. RALLS, K., BALLOU, J. and TEMPLETON, A. 1988. Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals.Conserv. Biol, 2, 185-193.
25. REEVE, E. c. R. 1955. Inbreeding with homozygotes at a disadvantage. Ann. Rev. Genet., 21,277-288.
26. SANGHVi, L. D. 1966. Inbreeding in India. Eugen. Quart., 13, 291-301.
27. SHARP, p. M. 1984. The effect of inbreeding on competitive male-mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics,106, 601-612.
28. SIMMONS, M. J. and CROW, J. F. 1977. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Ann. Rev. Genet., 11, 49-78.
29. Sittman, K., ABPLANALP, H. A. and FISHER, R. A. 1966. Inbreeding depression in Japanese quail. Genetics, 54,371-379.
30. TEMPLETON, A. R. and READ, B. 1983. The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke’s gazelle.In: Schonewald, C. M., Chambers, S. M., MacBryde, B.and Thomas, L. (eds) Genetics and Conservation, pp.241-262. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
31. TEMPLETON, A. R. and READ, B. 1984. Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke’s gazelle.Zoo Biol, 3,177-199.
32. WRIGHT, S. 1977. Evolution and Genetics of Populations, vol. 3. Experimental and Evolutionary Deductions. Universityof Chicago Press, Chicago.