Localization of a Dipolar Source in a Skull Phantom: Realistic Versus Spherical Model

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 41, Issue 10, 1994, Pages 986-989

  Menninghaus, Elisabeth ^a   Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a   Gonzalez, Sara L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b Neurosciences Center   (Cuba)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODELS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

HUMAN SKULL PHANTOMS; MAGNETIC DIPOLE ORIENTATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROMAGNETIC SOURCE LOCALIZATION; VOLUME CONDUCTOR MODEL;

BRAIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DIPOLE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHANTOM; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SKULL;

EID: 0028518795     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/10.324531     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J. W. H. Meijs, B. J. ten Voorde, M. J. Peters, C. J. Stok and F. H. Lopes da Silva, “The influence of various head models on EEG's and MEG's,” in Functional Brain Imaging, F. H. Lopes da Silva, Ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp. 31–45.
2. M. S. Hämäläinen and J. Sarvas, “Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 165–171, 1989.
3. D. B. Geselowitz, “On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-6, pp. 346–347, June 1970.
4. R. C. Barr, T. C. Pilkington, J. P. Boineau and M. S. Spach, “Determining surface potentials from current dipoles, with application to electrocardiography,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. BME-13, pp. 88–92, April 1966.
5. A. C. L. Barnard, I. M. Duck, M. S. Lynn and W. P. Timlake, “The application of electromagnetic theory to electrocardiology, II. Numerical solution of the integral equations,” Biophys. J., vol. 7, pp. 463–491, 1967.
6. M. S. Lynn and W. P. Timlake, “The use of multiple deflations in the numerical solution of singular systems of equations, with applications to potential theory,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 303–322, June 1968.
7. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986.
8. B. Lütkenhöner, C. Pantev and M. Hoke, “Comparison between different methods to approximate an area of the human head by a sphere,” in Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials (Advances in Audiology, vol. 6), F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G. L. Romani, Eds. Basel: Karger, 1990, pp. 103–118.
9. T. F. Oostendorp and A. van Oosterom, “Source parameter estimation in inhomogeneous volume conductors of arbitrary shape,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 36, pp. 382–391, 1989.
10. —, “Source parameter estimation using realistic geometry in bio-electricity and biomagnetism,” in Biomagnetic Localization and 3-D Modelling, J. Nenonen, H.-M. Rajala and T. Katila, Eds. Helsinki Univ. of Tech., Dep. Tech. Phys., Rep. TKK-F-A689, June 1991, pp. 71–86.
11. O. Bertrand, M. Thevenet and F. Perrin, “3-D finite element method in brain electrical activity studies,” in Biomagnetic Localization and 3-D Modelling, J. Nenonen, H.-M. Rajala and T. Katila, Eds. Helsinki Univ. of Tech., Dep. Tech. Phys., Rep. TKK-F-A689, June 1991, pp. 154–171.
12. D. Cohen, B. N. Cuffin, K. Yunokuchi, R. Maniewski, C. Purcell, G. R. Cosgrove, J. Ives, J. G. Kennedy and D. L. Schomer, “MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain,” Ann. Neurol., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 811–817, 1990.