3D Coupled Electromagnetic and Structural Finite Element Analysis of Motional Eddy Current Problems

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 1994, Pages 3288-3291

  Brauer, John R ^a   Ruehl, Jeffrey J ^a  

^a The MacNeal Schwendler Corporation ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDDY CURRENT LOSSES; ELECTROMAGNETIC MATERIAL PROPERTIES; ELECTROMAGNETIC SOLENOID ACTUATOR; FINITE ELEMENT SOFTWARE; NONLINEAR AXISYMMETRIC SOLENOID; THREE DIMENSIONAL ELECTROMAGNETIC;

ACTUATORS; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EDDY CURRENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETIC DEVICES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SOLENOIDS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; VECTORS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS;

EID: 0028515033     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: 19410069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/20.312640     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Yoshifumi ‘Panaka, “A calculating method of the deflection and eddy current of conductors in a time varying electro— magnetic field,” in Eiectromagnetic netic Forces and Applications, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992, pp. 445-448.
2. T Takagi, J. Tani, S. Matsuda, and S. Kawamura, “Analysis and experiment of dynamic deflection of a thin plate with a coupling effect,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, v. 28, March 1992, pp. 1259-1262.
3. Y. Crutzen, S. Papadopou1os, N. Richard, N. Siakevellas, and J. Wu, “Recent developments in transient magneto—structural integrated analysis for fusion applications,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, v. 28, March 1992, pp. 1311-1314.
4. B. E. MacNeal, J. R. Brauer, and R. N. Coppolino, “A general finite element vector potential formulation of electromagnetics using a time integrated electric scalar potential,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, v. 26, September 1990, pp. 1768-1770.
5. John R. Brauer and Franz Hirtenfelder, “Surface integrals on 3D and 2D finite element models for skin effect excitations and open boundaries,” IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, v. 28, March 1992, pp. 1659-1662.
6. J. R. Brauer, B. E. MacNeal, L. A. Larkin and V. D. Overbye, “New method of modeling electronic circuits coupled with 3D electromagnetic finite element models,” IEEE Thans on Magnetics, v. 27, Sept. 1991, pp. 4085-4088.
7. R. H. Vander Heiden, A. A. Arkadan, J. R. Brauer, and 0.1 Hummert, “Finite element modeling of a transformer feeding a rectified load: the coupled power electronics and magnetic field problem,” IEEE Pans. on Magnetics, V. 27, Nov. 1991, pp. 5217-5219.
8. John R. Brauer and Bruce E. MacNeal, “Finite element modeling of multiturn titurn windings with attached electric circuits,” IEEE Pans. on Magnetics, v. 29, March 1993, pp. 1693-1696.
9. John R. Brauer, Bruce E. MacNeal, and Franz Hirtenfelder, “New constraint technique for 3D finite element analysis of multiturn windings with attached electric circuits,” IEEE Pans. on Magnetics, Nov. 1993, in press.
10. John R. Brauer (ed.), What Eveiy Engineer Should Know About Finite Ekment Analysis, 2n d ed., New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993.
11. Herbert H. Woodson and James R. Melcher, Electromechanical Dynamics, New York: John Wiley Sons, 1968, p. 448.
12. J. R. Brauer, LA. Larkin, B. E. MacNeal, and J. J. Ruehl, “New nonlinear algorithms for finite element analysis of 2D and 3D magnetic fields,” Journal of Applied Physics, V. 69, April 15, 1991, pp. 5044-5046.
13. L R. Thrner and T. Q. Hua, “Results for the cantilever beam moving in crossed magnetic fields,” COMPEL, v 9, Sept. 1990, pp. 205-216.
14. K. Bessho, S. Yarnada, and Y. 1Canamura, “Analysis of transient characteristics of plunger type electromagnets,” Electr. Engineering in Japan, v 98, July 1978, pp. 56-62.