Adaptive Improvement of Magnetic Fields using Hierarchal Tetrahedral Finite Elements

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 1994, Pages 3511-3514

  Webb, J P ^a   Forghani, B ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Infolytica Corporation ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT; FLUX DENSITY; HIERARCHAL TETRAHEDRAL FINITE ELEMENT; IRON CORE MAGNET; TIME HARMONIC CURRENT;

ALGORITHMS; COPPER; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTRIC COILS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAGNETS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POLYNOMIALS; SHEET METAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VECTORS;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

EID: 0028514917     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: 19410069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/20.312696     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. I. Babuska, B. A. Szabo, I. N. Katz, ‘The p-version of the finite element method’, Siam J. Numer, Anal., vol. 18, pp.515-545, 1981.
2. J. P. Webb, B. Forghani, ‘Hierarchal scalar and vector tetrahedra’, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp.1495-1498, March 1993.
3. J. P. Webb, B. Forghani, ‘A T-Omega method using hierarchal edge elements’, submitted to IEE Proceedings-A.
4. J. P. Webb, B. Forghani, ‘A single scalar potential method for 3D magnetostatics using edge elements’, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 25, no. 5, pp.4126-4128, September 1989.
5. A. Bossavit, ‘Whitney forms: a class of finite elements for time-dimensional dimensional computations in electromagnetism’, IEE Proc., vol. 135, pt. A, no. 8, pp.493-500, November 1988.
6. J. Penman, M. D. Grieve, ‘Self-adaptive mesh generation technique for the finite-element method’, IEE Proc. A, vol. 134, no. 8, pp.634-650, September 1987.
7. P. Fernandes, P. Girdinio, G. Molinari, M. Repetto, ‘Local error estimate procedures as refinement indicators in adaptive meshing’, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp.4189-4192, September 1991.
8. S. Y. Hahn, C. Calmels, G. Meunier, J. L. Coulomb, ‘A posteriori error estimates for adaptive finite element mesh generation’, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.315-317, January 1988.
9. N. A. Golias, T. D. Tsiboukis, ‘Adaptive refinement strategies in three-dimensions’, dimensions’, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp.1886-1889, March 1993.
10. D. S. Kershaw, “The incomplete Cholesky-conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations’, J. Comp. Phys., vol. 26, pp.43-65, 1978.
11. J. Simkin, C. W. Trowbridge, ‘On the use of the total scalar potential in the numerical solution of field problems in electromagnetics’, Int. J. Num. Met. Engng., vol. 14, pp.423-440, 1979.
12. D. Rodger, J. F. Eastham, ‘Multiply connected regions in the A-Psi three-dimensional eddy-current formulation’, Proc. IEE, Pt A, vol. 134, no. 1, pp.58-66, January 1987.