|
|
|
Volumn 69, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 1027-1065
|
|
Posthumous reproduction.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
BRAIN DEATH;
CADAVER;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONFLICT;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DEATH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
DONOR;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO TRANSFER;
FAMILY SIZE;
FATHER;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GROUP PROCESS;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT (KANE);
HUMAN;
IN RE A.C.;
INDUCED ABORTION;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LABOR;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LIVING WILL;
LONG TERM CARE;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
REPRODUCTION;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SPERMATOZOON;
SPOUSE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HECHT V. SUPERIOR COURT (KANE);
IN RE A.C.;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
BRAIN DEATH;
CADAVER;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CRYOPRESERVATION;
DEATH;
DECISION MAKING;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
EMBRYO;
EMBRYO TRANSFER;
FATHERS;
FERTILIZATION IN VITRO;
FETUS;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HUMANS;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LABOR, OBSTETRIC;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
OWNERSHIP;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
POLITICS;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PUBLIC POLICY;
REPRODUCTION;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
SINGLE PERSON;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SPERMATOZOA;
SPOUSES;
TERMINALLY ILL;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TISSUE BANKS;
TISSUE DONORS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
|
EID: 0028505539
PISSN: 00196665
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (31)
|
|
References (0)
|
