An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: An industrialized housing application

IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers)

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 72-79

  Armacost, Robert L ^a   Componation, Paul J ^b   Mullens, Michael A ^a   Swart, William W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MARKETING; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; STRUCTURAL PANELS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BUILDING COMPONENTS;

EID: 0028464045     PISSN: 0740817X     EISSN: 15458830     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07408179408966620     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aczel, J., and Saaty, T. L., “Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgments." Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 27, 93-102
2. Akao, Y., Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge. MA, 191 (1990).
3. As wad, A.. “Quality Function Deployment: A Systems Ap proach,” Proceedings of the 1989 IIE Integrated Systems Conference, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 27-32 (1989).
4. Belton, V., and Gear, T., “On a Short-Coming of Saaty’s Method of Analytic Hierarchies," Omega, 11, 3, 228-230 (1984).
5. Bossert, J. L., Quality Function Deployment, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee (1991).
6. Clausing, D., and Pugh, S., “Enhanced QFD," Proceedings, Design Productivity Conference, Honolulu, HI (February 1991).
7. Dyer, J. S., “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, 36, 3, 249-258 (March 1990).
8. Expert Choice, McLean, VA: Decision Support Software, Inc. (1989).
9. Griffin, A., and Hauser, J. R., The Voice of the Customer, Report Number 92-106, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA (March 1992).
10. Harker, P. T., and Vargas, L. G., “Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, 33, 1383-1403 (1987).
11. Harker, P. T., and Vargas, L. G., Reply to Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process by J. S. Dyer, Management Science, 36, 3, 269-273 (March 1990).
12. Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D., “The House of Quality," Harvard Business Review (May-June 1988).
13. Jensen, R. E., “An Alternative Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures,'’ Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 28, 317-332 (1984).
14. Maddux, G. A., Amos, R. W., and Wyskida, A. R., “Organizations Can Apply Quality Function Deployment as Strategic Planning Tool,” Industrial Engineering, 33-37 (September 1991).
15. Madu, C. N., and Georantzas, N. C., "Strategic Thrust of Manufacturing Automation Decisions: A Conceptual Framework," IIE Transactions, 23, 2, 138-148 (June 1991).
16. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).
17. Saaty, T. L., “Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, 32, 841-855 (1986).
18. Saaty, T. L., Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA (1988).
19. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G., “Inconsistency and Rank Preservation," Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 28, 205-214
20. Saaty, T. L., “Rank Generation, Preservation, and Reversal in the Analytic Hierarchy Decision Process," Decision Sciences, 18. 2, 157-177 (1987).
21. Saaty, T. L., An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper Remarks on ihe Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 36. 3. 259-268 (March 1990).
22. Schoner, B., and Wedley, W. C., “Ambiguous Criteria Weights in AHP: Consequences and Solutions,” Decision Sciences, 20, 462-475 (1989).
23. Zahedi, P., “The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and Its Applications," Interfaces, 16, 96-108 (1986).