Vector One-Way Wave Absorbing Boundary Conditions for FEM Applications

IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 1994, Pages 872-878

  Sun, Weimin ^a   Balanis, Constantine A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA RADIATION; ANTENNAS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; DIELECTRIC MATERIALS; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE SCATTERING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; POLYNOMIALS; VECTORS;

SOMMERFIELD RADIATION CONDITION; VECTOR ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ABSORPTION;

EID: 0028449515     PISSN: 0018926X     EISSN: 15582221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/8.301715     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. C. H. Wilcox, “An expansion theorem for electromagnetic fields,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 9, pp. 115-134, 1956.
2. A. Bayliss and E. Turkel, “Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 33, pp. 707-725, 1980.
3. A. F. Peterson, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the vector wave equation,” Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 1, pp 62-64, Apr. 1988.
4. J. P. Webb and V. N. Kanellopoulos, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite element solution of the vector wave equation,” Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 2, pp 370-372, Oct. 1989.
5. J. P. Webb, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite element analysis of planar devices,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 38, pp. 1328-1332, Sept. 1990.
6. R. Mittra and O. Ramahi, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the direct solution of partial differential equations arising in electromagnetic scattering problems,” in Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods in Electromagnetic Scattering, M.A. Morgan, ed. New York: Elsevier, 1990, pp. 133-173.
7. A. Khebir, A. B. Kouki, and R. Mittra, “Asymptotic boundary conditions for finite element analysis of three-dimensional transmission line discontinuities,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 38, pp. 1427-1431, Oct. 1990.
8. A. F. Peterson, “Accuracy of 3-D radiation boundary conditions for use with the vector Helmholtz equation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 40, pp. 351-355, Mar. 1992.
9. J. Jin, The Finite Element Method in Electromagnetics. New York: Wiley, 1993, pp. 423-435.
10. E. L. Lindman, “Free-space boundary conditions for the time dependent wave equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 18, pp. 66-78, 1975.
11. B. Engquist and A. Majda, “Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves,” Math. Comput., vol. 31, pp. 629-651, My 1977.
12. R. L. Higdon, “Absorbing boundary conditions for difference approximations to the multi-dimensional wave equations,” Math. Comput., vol. 47, no. 176, pp. 437-459, Oct. 1986.
13. L. Halpern and L. N. Trefethen, “Wide-angle one-way wave equations,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1397-1404, Oct. 1988.
14. T. G. Moore, J. G. Blaschak, A. Taflove, and G. Kriegsmann, “Theory and application of radiation boundary operators,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-36, pp. 1797-1811, Feb. 1988
15. K. K. Mei and J. Fang, “Superabsorbtion A- method to improve absorbing boundary conditions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. 40, pp. 1001-1010, Sept. 1992
16. G. Jeng and A. Wexler, “Self-adjoint variational formulation of problems having non-self-adjoint operators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. MTT-26, pp. 91-94, Feb. 1978.