Transmission Quality of North American Cellular, Personal Communications, and Public Switched Telephone Networks

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 245-251

  Dimolitsas, Spiros ^a   Corcoran, Franklin L ^a   Baraniecki, Marion R ^b  

^a COMSOT Laboratories ^*  (United States)

^b INTELSAT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL; SPEECH CODING; SWITCHING SYSTEMS;

PUBLIC SWITCHED TELEPHONE NETWORKS; TRANSMISSION QUALITY;

CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

EID: 0028427810     PISSN: 00189545     EISSN: 19399359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/25.293642     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. CCITT Recommendation G.726, “40-, 32-, 24-, and 16-kbit/s adaptive differential pulse code modulation,” Geneva, Dec. 1990.
2. J.H. Chen, R. V. Cox, Y.C. Lin, N. Jayant, and M. J. Melchner, “A low-delay CELP coder for the CCITT 16 kb/s speech coding standard,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 830–849, June 1992.
3. CCITT Recommendation G.728, “Coding of speech at 16 kbit/s using low-delay code excited linear prediction,” Geneva, Sept. 1992.
4. I. A. Gerson and M. A. Jasiuk, “Vector-sum excited linear prediction—VSELP speech coding at 8 kbit/s,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP '90), Apr. 1990, pp. 461–464.
5. CCITT Recommendation G.113, “Transmission impairments,” Blue Book, vol. 3.1, pp. 63–114, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
6. CCITT Recommendation G.763 “Digital circuit multiplication equipment using 32 kbit/s ADPCM and digital speech interpolation,” Geneva, Dec. 1990.
7. CCITT Recommendation G.765, “Packet circuit multiplication equipment,” Geneva, Sept. 1992.
8. CCITT Contribution XV-TD.19 (XV/2), “Liaison statement to CCITT SG XV from CCIR TG 8/1: 8 kbit/s speech coding and 16 kbit/s speech coding,” Geneva, Nov. 2–10, 1992.
9. C. South et al., “Subjective performance assessment of CCIT1's 16 kbit/s speech coding algorithm,” Speech Communication, 1993.
10. CCITT Recommendation G.727, “5-, -4, 3, 2 bits per sample embedded adaptive differential pulse code modulation (ADPCM),” Geneva, Dec. 1990.
11. M. R. Schroeder and B. S. Atal, “Code-excited linear prediction (CELP): High quality speech at very low bitrates,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust. Speech, Signal Processing, ICASSP '85, 1985, pp. 937–940.
12. B. S. Atal and M. R. Schroeder, “Stochastic coding of speech at very low bit-rates,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC '84), 1984, pp. 610–613.
13. J. Gruber and G. Williams, Transmission Performance of Evolving Telecommunications Networks. Artech House, 1992.
14. D. L. Richards, Telecommunication by Speech. New York: Wiley, 1973.
15. CC111 Recommendation P.80, “Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality,” Blue Book, vol. 5, pp. 197–198, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
16. CCITT Recommendation P.82, “Method for evaluation of service from the standpoint of speech transmission quality,” Blue Book, vol. 5, pp. 203–207, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
17. S. Dimolitsas, “Subjective quality quantification of digital voice communication systems,” IEE Proc. PI, Communications, Speech and Vision, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 585–595, Dec. 1991.
18. S. Dimolitsas, “Subjective assessment methods for the measurement of digital speech coder quality,” in B. S. Atal, V. Cuperman, and A. Gersho, (Eds.), Speech and Audio Coding for Wireless and Network Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. CCITT Supplement 2, “Methods used for assessing telephony transmission performance,” Blue Book, vol. 5, pp. 237–248, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
20. CCITT Supplement 14, “Subjective performance assessments of digital processes using the modulated noise reference unit (MNRU),” Blue Book, vol. 5, pp. 341–360, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.
21. S. Dimolitsas, F. L. Corcoran, M. Baraniecki, and J. G. Phipps, Jr., “Multilingual subjective methodology and evaluation of low-rate digital voice processors,” COMSAT Tech. Rev., vol. 21, no. 2, Fall 1991.
22. H. G. Suyderhoud, “Dependence of mean opinion scores on difference in lingual interpretation,” COMSAT Tech. Rev., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 55–64, Spring 1987.
23. CCITT Recommendation P.81, “Modulated noise reference unit (MNRU),” Blue Book, vol. 5, pp. 198–203, Melbourne, Australia, 1988.