Identification of Continuous-Time Models

IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 887-897

  Johansson, Rolf ^a  

^a LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

ARMAR MODEL; ARRAY PROCESSING; HYBRID MODELING; SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0028407915     PISSN: 1053587X     EISSN: 19410476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/78.285652     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. K. J. Åström and T. Bohlin, “Numerical identification of linear dynamic systems from normal operating records,” in IFAC Symp. Self-Adaptive Syst. (England), 1965.
2. K. J. Åström, “Maximum likelihood identification and prediction error methods,” Automatica, vol. 16, pp. 551–574, 1980.
3. A. B. Clymer, “Direct system synthesis by means of computers,” Trans. AIEE, vol. 77, pt. I, pp. 798–806, 1959.
4. P. Eykhoff, System identification. New York: Wiley, 1974.
5. G. C. Goodwin and R. L. Payne, Dynamic System Identification—Experiment Design and Data Analysis. New York: Academic, 1977.
6. L. Homssi, A. Titli, and A. Despujols, “Continuous-time process identification: Comparison of eight methods and particular aspects,” in Cs. Bànyàsz and L. Keviczky (Eds.), Preprints 9th IFAC/IFORS Symp. Identification Syst. Parameter Estimation (Budapest, Hungary), 1991, pp. 1634–1642.
7. R. Johansson, “Identification of continuous-time dynamic systems,” in Proc. 25th IEEE Conf. Decision Contr. (Athens, Greece), 1986, pp. 1653–1658.
8. L. Ljung, “On the consistency of prediction error identification methods,” in System Identification, Advances and Case Studies (R. K. Mehra and D. G. Lainiotis, Eds.). New York: Academic, 1976.
9. L. Ljung, “Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-23, pp. 770–783, 1978.
10. R. H. Middleton and G. C. Goodwin, Digital Control and estimation—a unified approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.
11. B. C. Moore, “Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability and model reduction,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-26, pp. 17–32, 1981.
12. P. N. Paraskevopoulos, “System analysis and synthesis via orthogonal polynomial series and Fourier series,” IMACS Trans. vol. 27, pp. 453–469, 1985.
13. L. Pemebo, “An algebraic theory for the design of controllers for linear multivariable systems—Part II: Feedback realization and feedback design,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-26, pp. 182–193, 1981.
14. S. Sagara and Z. Y. Zhao, “Numerical integration approach to on-line identification of continuous-time systems,” Automatica, vol. 26, pp. 63–74, 1990.
15. D. C. Saha and G. P. Rao, Identification of Continuous Dynamical Systems—The Poisson Moment Functional (PMF) Approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, vol. 56.
16. T. Söderström and P. Stoica, System identification. London: Prentice Hall Int., UK 1989.
17. H. Unbehauen and G. P. Rao, Identification of Continuous-Time Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1987.
18. H. Unbehauen and G. P. Rao, “Continuous-time approaches to system identification—A survey,” Automatica, vol. 26, pp. 23–35, 1990.
19. B. Wahlberg, “System identification using Laguerre models,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. AC-36, pp. 551–562, 1991.
20. N. Wiener, Nonlinear Problems in Random'Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1958.
21. P. C. Young, “Applying parameter estimation to dynamic systems,” Contr. Eng., vol. 16, pp. 119–125, Oct. 1969; pp. 118–124, Nov. 1969.
22. P. C. Young, “Parameter estimation for continuous-time models—A survey” Automatica, vol. 17, pp. 23–29, 1981.