H∞-Optimal Control for Singularly Perturbed Systems—Part II: Imperfect State Measurements

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 280-299

  Pan, Zigang ^a   Basar, Tamer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; CONTROL THEORY; GAME THEORY; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STATE SPACE METHODS;

INFINITE HORIZON FORMULATIONS; QUADRATIC COST FUNCTIONS; SINGULARLY PERTURBED SYSTEMS;

OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 0028371999     PISSN: 00189286     EISSN: 15582523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/9.272324     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. G. Zanies, “Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformation, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-26, pp. 301–320, 1981.
2. B. A. Francis, A Course in Hoc Control Theory, (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 88). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
3. ∞ control problems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 34, no. 8, 831–847, 1989.
4. K. Glover and J. C. Doyle, “State-space formulae for all stabilizing controllers that satisfy an H 00 -norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity,” Sys. Contr. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 167–172, 1988.
5. ∞ -optimal control with state-feedback,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 786–788, 1988.
6. P. P. Khargonekar, K. N. Nagpal, and K. R. Poolla, “H 00 control with transients,” SIAM J. Contr. Optimiz., vol. 29, pp. 1373–1393, Nov. 1991.
7. R. Ravi, K. M. Nagpal, and P. P. Khargonekar, “H ∞ control for linear time varying systems: A state-space approach,” SIAM J. Contr. Optimiz., vol. 29, pp. 1394–1413, Nov. 1991.
8. A. A. Stoorvogel, The Ho:, Control Problem: A State Space Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
9. T. Ba§ar, “A dynamic games approach to controller design: Disturbance rejection in discrete time,” in Proc. 29th Conf. Decision Contr., Tampa, FL, Dec. 13–15, 1989; pp. 407–414. Also in IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 936–952, Aug. 1991.
10. ∞ -optimal control: The continuous-time case,” Differential Games: Developments in Modelling and Computation, R. P. Hamalainen, and H. K. Ehtamo, Eds., (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 156). New York: Springer-Verlag, Aug. 1991; 171–186.
11. K. Uchida and M. Fujita, “On the central controller: Characterizations via differential games and LEQG control problems,” Syst. Contr. Lett., vol. 13, no. 1, 9–13, 1989.
12. D. Limebeer, B. Anderson, P. Khargonekar, and M. Green, “A game theoretic approach to Hoo control for time varying systems,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Math. Theory of Networks and Syst., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1989.
13. I. Rhee and J. L. Speyer, “A game theoretic controller and its relationship to H°° and linear-exponential Gaussian synthesis,” in Proc. 29th Conf. Decision Cont., Tampa, FL, Dec. 13–15, 1989, pp. 909–915.
14. T. Ba§ar, “Optimum H°° designs under sampled state measurements,” Syst. Contr. Lett., vol. 16, pp. 399–409, June 1991.
15. H. T. Toivonen, “Sampled-data control of continuous-time systems with an Hoo optimality criterion,” Automatica, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 1992.
16. T. Ba§ar and P. Bernhard, H°°-Optimal Control and Related Min-imax Design Problems: A Dynamic Game Approach. Boston, MA: Birkhauser, 1991.
17. P. V. Kokotovid, H.K. Khalil, and J. O’Reilly, Singular Perturbation Methods in Control: Analysis and Design. New York; Academic, 1986.
18. Z. Pan and T. Ba§ar, “if 30 -optimal control for singularly perturbed systems. Part I: Perfect state measurements,” Automatica, vol. 29, no. 2, 401–423, Mar. 1993.
19. F. Garofalo and G. Leitmann, “A composite controller ensuring ultimate boundedness for a class of singularly perturbed uncertain systems,” Dynam. Stability Syst., vol. 3, no. 3 & 4, pp. 135–145, 1988.
20. M. Corless, G. Leitmann, and E.P. Ryan, “Control of uncertain systems with neglected dynamics,” in Deterministic Control of Uncertain Systems, A. S.I. Zinober, Ed. London: IEE Press, 1990, pp. 252–268.
21. F. Garofalo and G. Leitmann, “Nonlinear composite control of a class of nominally linear singularly perturbed uncertain systems,” in Deterministic Control of Uncertain Systems, A. S. I. Zinober, Ed. London: IEE Press, 1990, pp. 269–288.
22. D. W. Luse and J. A. Ball, “Frequency-scale decomposition of if°° -disk SIAM J. Contr. Optimiz., vol. 27, 814–835, Jul. 1989.
23. Z. Pan, “if 00 -optimal control for singularly perturbed systems,” Master's thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1992; also CSL Tech. Rep. UILU-ENG-92-2205 (DC-137).
24. J. H. Chow and P.V. Kokotovid, “A decomposition of near-optimum regulators for systems with slow and fast modes,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-21, pp. 701–705, Oct. 1976.
25. P. V. Kokotovic and R.A. Yackel, “Singular perturbation of linear regulators: Basic theorems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-17, pp. 29–37, Feb. 1972.
26. Z. Pan and T. Ba§ar, “if 00 -optimal control of singularly perturbed systems with sampled-state measurements,” in Advances in Dynamic Games and Applications, T. Ba§ar and A. Haurie, Eds. Boston, MA: Birkhauser, 1994, pp. 23–55.
27. T. Chen and B. Francis, “On the L 2 induced norm of a sampled-data system,” Syst. Contr. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 211–219, 1990.
28. ∞ sampled-data control,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 37, 418–435, Apr. 1992.
29. J. C. Willems, “Least squares stationary optimal control and the algebraic Riccati equation,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC 16, pp. 621–634, Dec. 1971.