Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 1994, Pages 620-625

  Bondy, Melissa L ^a   Lustbader, Edward D ^b   Halabi, Susan ^a   Ross, Eric ^b   Vogel, Victor G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0028267953     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.8.620     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Gail MH, Bnnton LA, Byar DP, et al: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879-1886, 1989.
2. Bondy ML, Vogel VG, Halabi S, et al: Identification of women at increased risk for breast cancer in a population-based screening program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1: 143-147, 1992.
3. Vogel VG, Peters GN, Evans WP. Design and conduct of a low-cost mammography screening project experience of the American Cancer Society, Texas Division. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158: 51-54, 1992.
4. Peters GN, Vogel VG, Evans WP, et al: The Texas Breast Screening Project Part I. Mammographie and clinical results. South Med J 86: 385-390,1993.
5. Vogel VG, Bondy M, Halabi S, et al: The Texas Breast Screening Project. Part II Demographics, risk profiles, and health practices of participants. South Med J 86: 391-396, 1993.
6. Gail MH, Bemchou J: Assessing the risk of breast cancer in individuals. In Cancer Prevention (Devita VT Jr, Heilman S, Rosenberg SA, eds) Philadelphia. Lippincott, 1992, pp 1-15.
7. Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, et al: Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 1450-1459, 1991.
8. Breslow NE, Day NE. Classical methods of analysis of grouped data In Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Vol 1.The Analysis of Case-Control Studies Lyon, France. IARC Sci Publ, 1980, pp 122-156.
9. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression New York. John Wiley & Sons, 1989, p 149.
10. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6 03. Cary, NC SAS Inst, 1988.
11. Lemtan C, Trock B, Rimer BK, et al: Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 114: 657-661,1991.
12. Claus EB. Risch N, Thompson WD. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 48: 232-242,1991.
13. Negn E, Decarli A, La Vecchia C, et al. Identification of high risk groups for breast cancer by means of logistic models. J Clin Epidemiol 43: 413-418,1990.