Measurement of Otoacoustic Emissions for Hearing Assessment

IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 210-226

  Whitehead, M L ^a   Stagner, B B ^a   Lonsburv Martin, B L ^a   Martin, G K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; DEVICE; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HUMAN; INNER EAR; NEWBORN SCREENING; NOISE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; WAVEFORM; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; HEARING LOSS; MEASUREMENT; MICROPHONE; NOISE REDUCTION; SOUND PRESSURE;

AUDITION; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; PHYSIOLOGY;

HEARING ASSESSMENT; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS;

ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS;

EID: 0028241652     PISSN: 07395175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/51.281681     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK: A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2027–2067, 1991.
2. Kemp DT: Stimulated acoustic emissions from w ithin the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391, 1978.
3. Kemp DT: Hearing faculty testing and appara tus therefor. US Patent No. 4.374,526, 1983.
4. Hudspeth AJ: How the ear's works work. Nature 341:397–404, 1989.
5. Brownell WE: Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11:82–92, 1990.
6. Dallos P : The active cochlea. J Neurosci 12:4575–4585, 1992.
7. Ruggero MA: Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of th e mammalian cochlea. Current Opinions Neurobiol 2:449–456, 1992.
8. Yates GK, Johnstone BM, Patuzzi RB, Robertson D: Mechanical preprocessing in the mammalian cochlea. Trends Neurosci 15:57–61, 1992.
9. Lonsbury-Martin BL, Whitehead ML, Martin GK: Clinical applications of otoacoustic emissions. J Sp Hear Res 34:964–981, 1991.
10. Hall JW: Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, pp 475-508,1992.
11. Otodynamics Ltd, 36–38 Beaconsfield, Hatfield, Herts, AL 10 8BB, UK.
12. Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brow n AM: Acoustic emission cochleography-practical aspects. Scand Audiol Supp1 25:71–95, 1986.
13. Bray P, Kemp DT: An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Brit J Audio 21:191–204, 1987.
14. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P : A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 11:93–105, 1990.
15. Kemp DT, Ryan S : Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 482:73–84, 1991.
16. Ravazzani P, Grandori F : Evoked otoacoustic emissions. Nonlinearities and response inter pretation. IEEETrans Biomed Engng 40:500–504, 1993.
17. Stover L and Norton SJ: The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 94:2670–2681, 1993.
18. Virtual Corp, 521 SW 11th, Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205.
19. Etymotic Research, 61 Martin Lane, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007.
20. Brown AM, Kemp DT: Suppressibility of the 2f 1 -f 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 13:29–37, 1984.
21. Martin GK, Probst R, Scheinin SA, Coats AC, Lonsbury-Martin BL: Acoustic distortion products in rabbits. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res 28:191–208, 1987.
22. Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W : Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 83:652–656, 1988.
23. Kimberley B, Brown DK, Eggermont J: Measuring human cochlear traveling wave delay using distortion product emission phase responses. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 1343–1350, 1993.
24. Wilson JP: Recording of the Kemp echo and tinnitus from the ear canal without averaging. J Physio 298:8-9P, 1980.
25. Norton SJ, Widen JE: Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing infants and children: Emerging data and issues. Ear and Hearing 11:121–127, 1990.
26. Lafreniere D, Jung MD, Smurzynski J, Leonard G, Kim DO, Sasek J: Distortion product and click evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 117:1382–1389, 1991.
27. Kok MR, van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP, Wallenburg HCS: Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiology 32:213–224, 1993.
28. Lasky R, Perlman J, Hecox K : Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. Ear Hear 13:430–441, 1992.
29. Widrow B, Stearns SD: Adaptive Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985.
30. Ozdamar O, Delgado RE: Evoked potential processing with spectral averaging, adaptive averaging, two dimensional filters, electrode configuration and method therefor. US Patent No. 5,230,344, 1993.
31. Zurek PM: Detectability of transient and sinusoidal otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 13:307–310, 1992.
32. Davies WDT: Generation and properties of maximum length sequences. Control 10:302–304, 364-365,431-433, 1966.
33. Burkhard R, Shi Y, Hecox KE: A comparison of maximum length and Legendre sequences for the derivation of brain-stem auditory-evoked responses at rapid rates of stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 87: 1656–1664, 1990.
34. Chu WT: Architectural acoustic measurements using periodic pseudorandom sequences and FFT. J Acoust Soc Am 76:475–478, 1984.
35. Picton TW, Kellett AJC, Shi Y, Vezsenyi M, Rabinovitch DE: Otoacoustic emissions recorded at rapid stimulus rates. Ear Hear, 1993.
36. Thornton ARD: High rate otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 94: 132–136, 1993.
37. Kemp DT, Chum R : Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 2:213–232, 1980.