Satisfaction of search in the detection of plain-film abnormalities in abdominal contrast studies

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 1994, Pages 403-409

  Franken, Edmund A ^a   Berbaum, Kevin S ^a   Lu, Charles H ^a   Kannam, Sri ^a   Dorfman, Donald D ^a   Warnock, Niall G ^a   Simonson, Tereasa M ^a   Pelsang, Retta E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic radiology; Observer performance; Radiologists; Radiology education; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGING SYSTEM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGIST; VISION;

EID: 0028232170     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199404000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Smith MJ. Error and variation in diagnostic radiology. Springfield, 1L: Charles C Thomas; 1967:27.
2. Tuddenham WJ. Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis: studies of the psychophysiology of roentgen image perception. Radiology 1962;78:694–704.
3. Tuddenham WJ. Problems of perception in chest roentgenology: facts and fallacies. Radiol Clin North Am 1963;1:227–289.
4. Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Dorfman DD, et al. Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 1990;25:133–140.
5. Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Dorfman DD, et al. Time course of satisfaction of search. Invest Radiol 1991;26:640–648.
6. Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Anderson KL, et al. The influence of clinical history on visual search with single and multiple abnormalities. Invest Radiol 1993;28:191–201.
7. Rockette HE, Gur D, Metz CE. The use of continuous and discrete confidence judgments in receiver operating characteristic studies of diagnostic imaging techniques. Invest Radiol 1992;27:169–172.
8. Metz CE, Shen J-H, Herman BA. New methods for estimating a binormal ROC curve from continuously-distributed test results. Presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association: Anaheim, CA, August 7, 1990.
9. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Dorfman DD, et al. Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1986;21:532–539.
10. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Dorfman DD, Barloon TJ. Influence of clinical history upon detection of nodules and other lesions. Invest Radiol 1988;23:48–55.
11. Berbaum KS, Dorfman DD, Franken EA. Measuring observer performance by ROC analysis: indications and complications. Invest Radiol 1989;24:228–233.
12. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS. RSCORE-J: Pooled rating method data: a computer program for analyzing pooled ROC curves. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation 1986;18:452–462.
13. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1971:44-48, 514–599.
14. Macmillan NA, Kaplan HL. Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false alarm rates. Psychol Bull 1986;98:185–199.
15. Metz CE. Current problems in ROC analysis. In: Peppier WW, Alter AA, eds. Proceedings of the chest imaging conference 1987. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin, 1987:315–336.