Hip arthroplasty using the cementless CLS stem. A 2-4-year experience

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 177-192

  Robinson, Raymond P ^a,b   Lovell, Timothy P ^c   Green, Thomas M ^a,b  

^a VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Rockwood Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

CLS stem; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FRACTURE HEALING; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ALLOYS; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 0028220083     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90067-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Range of Motion Studies for Total Hip Replacements
2. CLS press-fit total hip arthroplasty
3. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two-year results of a prospective consecutive series
4. Design features and early clinical results with a modular proximally fixed low bending stiffness uncemented total hip replacement: “S-ROM modular sterm system”
5. Zementfreie CLS-huftendoprothese: mittelfristige erfahrungen
6. Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old
7. Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results
8. The case for porous-coated hip implants. The femoral side.
9. CLS femoral component
10. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.
11. A comparison of three varieties of noncemented porous-coated hip replacements
12. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation
13. Two year follow-up of the PCA non-cemented total hip replacement
14. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
15. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results
16. Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: the impact of modular head neck components
17. Comparison of a hybrid with an uncemented total hip replacement: a retrospective matched-pair study
18. The cementless CLS stem
19. Materialverschleiss und gewerbereaktion bei kinstlichen gelenken
20. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses: A comparison of clinical and radiographic results at two to four years