A corpus-based study of repair cues in spontaneous speech

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 1994, Pages 1603-1616

  Hirschberg, Julia ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; LINGUISTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CUES; EXPERT SYSTEMS; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PHONETICS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0028215480     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: NA     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.408547     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bear, J. Dowding, J., and Shriberg, E. (1992). “Integrating multiple knowledge sources for detection and correction of repairs in human-computer dialog,” in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting (Association for Computational Linguistics, Newark, DE), pp. 56–63.
2. Blackmer, E. R. and Mitton, J. L. (1991). “Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech,” Cognition 39, 173–194.
3. Breiman, L., Friedman, H. J., Olshen, R. A., and Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees (Wadsworth & Brooks, Pacific Grove, CA).
4. Carbonell, J. and Hayes, P. (1983). “Recovery strategies of parsing extragrammatical language,” Am. J. Comput. Linguist. 9(3-4), 123–146.
5. Cooper, W. E. and Sorenson, J. M. (1977). “Fundamental frequency contours at syntactic boundaries,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 683–692.
6. Fink, P. E. and Biermann, A. W. (1986). “The correction of ill-formed input using history-based expectation with applications to speech understanding,” Comput. Linguist. 12(1), 13–36.
7. Gee, J. P. and Grosjean, F. (1983). “Performance structure: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal,” Cognitive Psychol. 15, 411–458.
8. Hindle, D. (1983). “Deterministic parsing of syntactic non-fluencies,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting (Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, MA), pp. 123–128.
9. Hirschberg, J. and Nakatani, C. (1993). “A speech-first model for repair identification in spoken language systems,” in Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Berlin, September (Eurospeech-93, Berlin).
10. Howell, P. and Young, K. (1991). “The use of prosody in highlighting alterations in repairs from unrestricted speech,” Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 43A(3), 733–758.
11. Labov, W. (1966). “On the grammaticality of everyday speech,” Paper Presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting.
12. Laver, J. (1980). “Monitoring systems in the neurolinguistic control of speech production,” in Errors in Linguistic Performance, edited by V. Fromkin (Academic, New York), pp. 287–305.
13. Lee, C.-H., Rabiner, R., Pieraccini, R., and Wilpon, J. (1990). “Acoustic modeling for large vocabulary speech recognition,” Comput. Speech Lang. 4, 127–165.
14. Levelt, W. and Cutler, A. (1983). “Prosodic marking in speech repair,” J. Semantics 2, 205–217.
15. Levelt, W. (1983). “Monitoring and self-repair in speech,” Cognition 14, 41–104.
16. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (MIT, Cambridge, MA).
17. Lickley, R. J. and Bard, E. G. (1992). “Processing disfluent speech: Recognizing disfluency before lexical access,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, October (ICSLP, Banff), pp. 935–938.
18. Lickley, R. J., Shillcock, R. C., and Bard, E. G. (1991). “Processing disfluent speech: How and when are disfluencies found?” in Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Vol. III (Eurospeech-91, Genova), pp. 1499–1502.
19. Lickley, R. J. (1993) (personal communication).
20. Ljolje, A. and Riley, M. D. (1992). “Optimal speech recognition using phone recognition and lexical access,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, October (ICSLP, Banff), pp. 313–316.
21. Local, J. and Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and “silences”. Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Hum. Studies 9, 185–204.
22. MADCOW (1992). “Multi-site data collection for a spoken language corpus,” in Proceedings of the Speech and Natural Language Workshop, February (DARPA, Harriman, NY), pp. 7–14.
23. Nakatani, C. and Hirschberg, J. (1993a). “A speech-first model for repair identification in spoken language systems,” in Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology (ARPA, Plainsboro, NJ).
24. Nakatani, C. and Hirschberg, J. (1993b). “A speech-first model for repair detection and correction,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting (Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbus, OH).
25. Nooteboom, S. G. (1980). “Speaking and unspeaking: Detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech,” in Errors in Linguistic Performance, edited by V. Fromkin (Academic, New York), pp. 287–305.
26. Olive, J., Greenwood, A., and Coleman, J. (1993). The Acoustics of American English Speech: A Dynamic Approach (Springer-Verlag, New York).
27. O'Shaughnessy, D. (1992). “Analysis of false starts in spontaneous speech,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, October (ICSLP, Banff), pp. 931–934.
28. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). “The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Techology, September. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.
29. Riley, M. D. (1989). “Some applications of tree-based modeling to speech and language,” in Proceedings of the Speech and Natural Language Workshop, October (DARPA, Cape Cod, MA).
30. Selkirk, E. O. (1984).“Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure,” in Nordic Prosody II: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Prosody in the Nordic Language, edited by T. Freyjeim (Trondheim, TAPIR), pp. 111–140.
31. Shriberg, E., Bear, J., and Dowding, J. (1992). “Automatic detection and correction of repairs in human-computer dialog,” in Proceedings of the Speech and Natural Language Workshop (DARPA, Harriman, NY), pp. 419–424.
32. Talkin, D. (1989). “Looking at speech,” Speech Technol. pp. 74–77.
33. Wang, M. Q., and Hirschberg J. (1992). “Automatic classification of intonational phrase boundaries,” Comput. Speech Lang. 6, 175–196.
34. Ward W. (1991). “Understanding spontaneous speech: the Phoenix System,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (IEEE, New York), pp. 365–367.
35. Weischedel, R. M. and Black, J. (1980). “Responding to potentially unparseable sentences,” Am. J. Comput. Linguist. 6, 97–109.
36. Weischedel, R. M., and Sondheimer, N. K. (1983). “Meta-rules as a basis for processing ill-formed input,” Am. J. Comput. Linguist. 9(3-4), 161–177.