Contextual techniques for classification of high and low resolution remote sensing data

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 1994, Pages 1037-1051

  Kartikeyan, B ^a   Gopalakrishna, B ^a   Kalubarme, M H ^a   Majumder, K L ^a  

^a INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION; CONTEXTUAL TECHNIQUE; CONTEXTUAL TECHNIQUES; GAUSSIAN MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING;

IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

CONTEXTUAL TECHNIQUES; GAUSSIAN MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; HIGH RESOLUTION DATA; LOW RESOLUTION DATA;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 0028166622     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431169408954132     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Amadamn, M., and King, R. A., 1988, Low level segmentation of multispectral images via agglomerative clustering of uniform neighborhoods, Pattern Recognition, 21, 261-268.
2. Bishop, Y., Fiendberg, S., and Holland, P., 1975, Discrete Multivariate Analysis-Theory and Practice (MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts).
3. Congalton, R. G, Oderwald, R. G., and Mead, R. A., 1983, Assessing Landsat classification accuracy using discrete multivariate analysis statistical techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49, 1671-1678.
4. Eklundh, J. O., Yamamoto, H., and Rosenfeld, A., 1980, A Relaxation method for multispectral pixel classification. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-2, 72-75.
5. Faugeras, O. D., and Berthod, M. M., 1981, Improving consistency and reducing ambiguity in stochastic labeling: An optimization approach. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-3, 412-424.
6. Haralick, R. M., and Joo, H., 1986, A context classifier. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-24, 997-1007.
7. Haslett, J., 1985, Maximum likelihood discriminant analysis on the plane using a Markovian model of spatial context. Pattern Recognition, 18, 287-296.
8. Kalayhh, H. M., and Landgrebe, D. A., 1987, Stochastic model utilizing spectral and spatial characteristics. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-9, 457-461.
9. Kettig, R. L., and Landgrebe, D. A., 1976, Classification of multispectral image data by Extraction and Classification of Homogeneous Objects. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geosciencc and Remote Sensing, GE-14, 17-26.
10. Khazenie, N., and Crawford, M. M., 1990, Spatial-temporal autocorrelated model for contextual classification. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-28, 529-539.
11. Merickel, M. B., Landgrebe, J. C., and Shen, S. S., 1984, A spatial processing algorithm to reduce the effects of mixed pixels and increase the separability between classes. Pattern Recognition, 17, 525-533.
12. Peleg, S., 1980, A new probabilistic relaxation scheme. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-2, 362-369.
13. Richards, J. A., Landgrebe, D. A., and Swain, P. H., 1981, Pixel labeling by supervised probabilistic relaxation. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PA MI-3, 188-191.
14. Swain, P. H., Vardeman, S. B., and Tilton, J. C., 1981, Contextual classification of multispectral image data. Pattern Recognition, 13, 429-441.
15. Tilton, J. C., Vardeman, S. B., and Swain, P. H., 1982, Estimation of context for statistical classification of multispectral image data. I.E.E.E. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-20, 445-452.
16. Toussaint, G. C., 1978, The use of context in pattern recognition. Pattern Recognition, 10, 189-204.