MR imaging of prostate cancer with an endorectal surface coil technique: Correlation with whole-mount specimens

Radiology

Volumn 190, Issue 2, 1994, Pages 323-327

  Quinn, Stephan F ^a   Franzini, Daisy A ^a   Demlow, Thomas A ^a   Rosencrantz, David R ^a   Kim, Jinho ^a,b   Hanna, Rafik M ^a,c   Szumowski, Jerzy ^a,d  

^a LEGACY GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance (MR), surface coils; Prostate, MR; Prostate, neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RECTUM; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0028010033     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.2.8284376     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Silverberg E, Boring CC, Squires TS. Cancer facts and figures. CA 1990; 40:12-15.
2. Stamey TA, Freiha FS, McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Whittemore AS. Localized prostate cancer. Cancer 1993; 71:933-938.
3. Murphy GP, Natarajan N, Pontes JE, et al. The national survey of prostate cancer in the United States by the American College of Surgeons. J Urol 1982; 127:928-934.
4. Zietman AL, Shipley WU, Willett CG. Residual disease after radical surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 1993; 71:959-969.
5. Bezzi M, Kressel HY, Allen KS, et al. Prostatic carcinoma: staging with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 169:339-346.
6. Phillips ME, Kressel HY, Spritzer CE, et al. Prostatic disorders: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987; 164:386-392.
7. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:621-626.
8. Martin JF, Hajek P, Baker L, Gylys-Morin V, Fitzmorris-Glass R, Mattrey RR. Inflatable surface coil for MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology 1988; 167:268-270.
9. Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HM, Imai Y, Kressel HY. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989; 172:570-574.
10. Schnall MD, Bezzi M, Pollack HM, Kressel HY. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Magn Reson Q 1990; 6:1-16.
11. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J, Pollack HM, Kressel HY. Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 178:797-802.
12. Parivar F, Vasanthan R, Waluch V, Eto RT, Jones LW, Ross BD. Endorectal surface coil MR imaging of prostatic carcinoma with the inversion-recovery sequence. JMRI 1991; 1:657-664.
13. Mirowitz SA. Seminal vesicles: biopsy-related hemorrhage simulating tumor invasion at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185:373-376.
14. Mirowitz SA, Brown JJ, Heiken JP. Evaluation of the prostate and prostatic carcinoma with gadolinium-enhanced endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186: 153-157.
15. Donahue RE, Miller GJ. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: biopsy to whole mount - Denver VA experience. Urol Clin North Am 1991; 18:449-452.
16. Schnall MD, Connick T, Hayes CE, Lenkinski RE, Kressel HY. MR imaging of the pelvis with an endorectal-external multi-coil array. JMRI 1992; 2:229-232.
17. Ramchandani P, Schnall MD. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28:74-82.
18. Stamey TA, Villers A, McNeal JE, Link PC, Freiha FS. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of apical dissection. J Urol 1990; 143:1166-1173.
19. Rosen MA, Goldstone L, Lapin S, Wheeler T, Scardino PT. Frequency and location of extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 1992; 148:331-337.
20. Villers A, McNeal JE, Redwine E, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostate adenocarcinoma. J Urol 1989; 142:763-768.
21. Byar DP, Mostofi FK. Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies. Cancer 1972; 30:5-13.
22. Greene DR, Wheeler TM, Egawa S, Dunn JK, Scardino PT. A comparison of the morphological features of cancer arising in the transition zone and in the peripheral zone of the prostate. J Urol 1991; 146:1069-1076.
23. Greene DR, Egawa S, Neerhut G, Flanagan W, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT. The distribution of residual cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens in stage A prostate cancer. J Urol 1991; 145:324-329.
24. Johansson JE, Adami HO, Andersson SO, Bergstrom R, Krusemo UB, Kraaz W. Natural history of localized prostatic cancer. Lancet 1989; 1:799-803.
25. McNeal JE, Villers AA, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 1990; 66:1225-1233.
26. Wheeler TM. Anatomic considerations in carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Clin North Am 1989; 16:623-634.
27. Miller GJ, Gygom JM. Diagnostic correlations with whole mounts of radical prostatectomy specimens. In: Gardner WA, Weinstein RS, eds. Pathology and pathobiology of urinary bladder and prostate. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1992; 183-197.
28. Middleton RG, Smith JA. Radical prostatectomy for stage B2 prostatic cancer. J Urol 1982; 127:702-703.
29. Boxer RJ, Kaufman JJ, Goodwin WE. Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: 1951-1976 - a review of 329 patients. J Urol 1977; 117:208-213.
30. Correa RJ, Gibbons RP, Cummings KB, Mason JT. Total prostatectomy for stage B carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1977; 117: 328-329.
31. Johansson JE, Adami HO, Anderson SO, Bergstrom R, Holmberg L, Krusemo UB. High 10-year survival rate in patients with early, untreated prostatic cancer. JAMA 1992; 267:2191-2196.
32. Graversen PH, Nielsen KT, Gasser TC, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus expectant primary treatment in stages I and II prostatic cancer: a fifteen year follow-up. Urology 1990; 36:493-498.
33. Madsen PO, Graversen PH, Gasser TC, Corle DK. Treatment of localized prostatic cancer: radical prostatectomy versus placebo - a 15-year follow-up. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988; 110:95-100.