Long‐term pain: Less common after laparoscopic than open cholecystectomy

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 81, Issue 9, 1994, Pages 1368-1370

  Stiff, G ^a   Rhodes, M ^a   Kelly, A ^b   Telford, K ^a   Armstrong, C P ^b   Rees, B I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^b FRENCHAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0027993670     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800810939     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. The postcholecystectomy syndromes
2. Confidence bounds for the difference between two probabilities
3. Postcholecystectomy symptoms. A prospective study of gall stone patients before and two years after surgery
4. Satisfaction after cholecystectomy
5. Symptomatic gallstone disease; before and after cholecystectomy
6. Symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
7. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients
8. Outcome after cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease and effect of surgical access: laparoscopic v open approach
9. The postcholecystectomy syndrome
10. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy
11. Surgery as placebo. A quantitative study of bias
12. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard
13. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new ‘gold standard’?
14. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases